Timothy Brian Rien

Timothy Brian Rien

3.9
Rating: 8.8

Licensed for 48 years

White collar crime Lawyer at Livermore, CA
Practice Areas: White Collar Crime, Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI

39 South Livermore Avenue, Suite 209, Livermore, CA

About Timothy

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 48 years

State: California

Acquired: 1977

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Timothy B. Rien

39 South Livermore Avenue, Suite 209, Livermore, CA, 94550

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Timothy Brian Rien's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.9 /5.0

7 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (7) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | August 21, 2015 | Criminal Defense

Bad experience, wouldn't recommend

I had a really bad experience with Tim as my attorney. I was accused of a crime and hired him after my arraignment. I chose him because he quoted me at about half the price of any other lawyer I spoke with. A few days later, he explained that this was a "pre-charging" rate (what you would charge a cl...ient who was being investigated but not yet formally charged) and that I actually owed him twice the initial rate he quoted. While I probably could have had him better clarify what he was asking for in the beginning, it seems dishonest and manipulative to give me a pre-charging rate after arraignment, since a pre-charging rate would be irrelevant for what I was hiring him for. Tim also encouraged me also to pay $4,000 to a private investigator he knew to help with my defense. I was skeptical but Tim insisted it was a good idea. In the end, none of the information he collected was used in my defense. Tim didn't appear at a single of my court appearances, but sent other less experienced lawyers in his place (and this was for a serious felony charge). He had me waive my right to appear in court, claiming that judges subconsciously would come to associate my face with criminality if I came to my court dates. Another lawyer suggested that Tim actually probably didn't want to draw my attention to the fact that he didn't personally intend to come to court for me at all. On one occasion, the lawyer he sent arrived two hours late with no communication. On another, his office sent me a notice of my next court date saying I should not come in person and they would represent me as usual. I went out of state for a business trip and emailed the night before to ask if I could get an update after court. Then they told me I actually was supposed to appear in the morning so I could accept the DA's plea bargain (which I already told them I didn't want to accept). I was confused and terrified because it would have been impossible for me to return on time, and because I wondered why no one had remembered or understood I didn't want to take the plea. Tim wrote me a rather diplomatic email apologizing for the office's poor communication. That was literally the last time I ever heard from him during my case. I thanked him for the email but asked again what had gone wrong exactly, and he had Melissa Adams (another lawyer from the firm) write me a email saying that communication error had actually been my fault because I was supposed to contact them again in the meantime (which no one had ever told me). I asked for clarification and she ignored my email. I believe it was basically a good cop/bad cop routine Tim put together to try to hide how disorganized they were. I often had to wait several days to a week to get answers to questions I had. The crime I was accused of was supposedly caught on a surveillance video. The footage would have completely exonerated me, but someone from the prosecution's side destroyed it. Even with this, Tim's firm wasn't able to neogtiate my case effectively, and I did end up taking the plea bargain in the end out of frustration. Now I have a criminal record. I really regret not going with a public defender because I know they could not have done any worse and I wouldn't have spent $14,000. Had I decided to push forward, I definitely would have hired someone else for trial. I frankly felt as at odds with Tim as I did with the police and prosecutor. I felt like they already saw me as a criminal and didn't believe or care about what had actually happened. Even if the outcome had been the same, I wish I had gone with a lawyer who had better communication skills and appeared to actually care about my case. I would not recommend him for these reasons.

See All Client Reviews

Timothy Brian Rien's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Timothy
Melinda Garcia headshot
Melinda Garcia

Criminal defense lawyer | Sep 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I had known Mr. Rien by reputation only. He is AV rated, voted a Super Lawyer every year and of course, I had seen him on tv with some of his high profile cases making the news. Years later, I had the pleasure of meeting him professionally. I refer him matters with great confidence in his firm's professionalism."

Harry Edward Hudson Jr headshot
Harry Hudson

Criminal defense lawyer | Jun 04

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have known Mr. Rien professionally for several years. We have represented defendants in the same case. Mr. Rien was always prepared."

View All Endorsements
Melinda Garcia headshot
Melinda Garcia

Business lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.8 (Excellent)

Honors

2014

Certified Specialist, State Bar of California

2013

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers Association

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

1989

Six "Best" Criminal Defense Lawyers, San Francisco Newspaper Group

1982

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1978 - 1982

Deputy District Attorney, Sonoma County Da's Office

Associations

1983 - Present

State Bar of California

Certified Specialist

1982 - Present

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Member

1982 - Present

California Attorneys for Criminal Justice

Member

1982 - Present

California Public Defenders Association

Member

1982 - Present

The San Francisco Criminal Defense Lawyer's Association

Member

1982 - Present

Criminal Trial Lawyers Association of Northern California

Member

1977 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1977 - Present

Criminal Law Section

Member

1977 - Present

Criminal Law Court Appointed Attorneys

Member

1977 - Present

Eastern Alameda County Bar Association

Lawyer Referral

Education

2007

Univeristy of San Francisco

Master Fine Arts

1977

Western State University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1974

California State University, Stanislaus

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Publications

1986

California Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB) California Criminal Law- Practice and Procedure
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution