Palo Alto, CA
Employment and labor Lawyer at Palo Alto, CA
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Business ... +3 more
OUTCOME: Trial Court Judgment affirmed on appeal
Defendants were sued by their contractor for fees, however the contractor was found to be unlicensed, due to a failure to maintain workers' compensation insurance, resulting in a judgment in favor of d ... efendants, cross-complainants and awarding them reimbursement of all fees previsously paid to the plaintiff contractor, punitive damages and attorneys' fees.
OUTCOME: Trial Court ruling in favor of plaintiff affirmed.
Plaintiff Temple sue defendant, a professional adoption facilitator, for misrepresentation in connection with an adoption proceeding, but elected for personal reasons to dismiss the case. The defendant ... sought a "prevailing party" fee award pursuant to Family Code section 8635. The trial court denied the motion, and defendant appealed. The court of appeal affirmed the trial court's ruling in favor of plaintiff.
OUTCOME: Trial court judgment affirmed.
Mr. Migdal sued Mr. Patel and others for a breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and conspiracy in connection with a business transaction involving the purchase of real estate. Mr. Patel moved for summary j ... udgment in the trial court as to all causes of action and the motion was granted. Mr. Migdal appealed, but the court of appeal affirmed the trial court ruling in full.
OUTCOME: Trial court order affirmed on appeal
Plaintiff Ash filed a lawsuit against defendant, asserting various causes of action arising out of a foreclosure. Defendants, who had been beneficiaries of an historical deed of trust but whose interes ... t was assigned many years before, strenuously denied liability. A settlement was reached during the trial, but Ash refused to execute the final settlement documents without certain changes. Defendants moved to enforce the judgment, and their motion was granted. Ash appealed on a variety of grounds, challenging a variety of trial court rulings in addition to the enforcement of the settlement. The trial court rulings were affirmed in favor of defendants.
OUTCOME: Plaintiff verdict: $5 million; affirmed on appeal
The Gene Schick Company had been a distributor of Sub-Zero for many years when its distributorship was terminated. The Schick Company sued for wrongful termination of the distributorship, among other c ... laims, seeking lost profits. The jury awarded plaintiff $5 million in lost profits. Defendant appealed unsucessfully - the judgment was affirmed.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
