David Escamilla v. M2 Technology, Inc., 4:12-cv-634-RAS (E.D. Tex.).
Oct 05, 2012OUTCOME: Preliminary Injunction denied.
Defend client against allegations of trademark infringement by pro se plaintiff and purported owner by assignment of M2 mark.
Palo Alto, CA
Patent application Lawyer at Palo Alto, CA
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Litigation ... +3 more
OUTCOME: Preliminary Injunction denied.
Defend client against allegations of trademark infringement by pro se plaintiff and purported owner by assignment of M2 mark.
OUTCOME: Default judgment and fee award against plaintiff affirmed on appeal to 5th Circuit.
Declaratory Judgment action against Mr. Escamilla's company, M2 Software, that our client did not infringe our client's mark.
OUTCOME: Case Dismissed.
Defend client from trademark litigation assertions by pro se plaintiff in federal court.