Wingle v. IRS
Aug 30, 2004OUTCOME: Dismissal of case in favor of client
Plaintiff alleged civil rights violations associated with a collection proceeding.
Paul S Ham's Legal Cases (50)
San Francisco, CA
Tax fraud and tax evasion Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Tax Fraud & Tax Evasion, Tax ... +2 more
United States v. Brooks
Jun 30, 2004OUTCOME: Judgment in favor of client
Erroneous refund claim in which a garnishment of wages was granted in favor of client.
People of CA v United States
Jun 07, 2004OUTCOME: Dismissal of case in favor of client
Plaintiff sought injunctive relief against client.
Placer Foreclosure v. Cichowicz
Dec 23, 2003OUTCOME: Distribution of funds to client
Interpleader action in which client held lien.
Frank Kuest v. United States,
N/AOUTCOME: Complete concession in favor of client after takin
Plaintiff filed suit challenging assessment as a responsible person for the corporation’s portion of withheld payroll taxes.
United States v. Sanders
N/AOUTCOME: Summary judgment in favor of client.
Filed suit to enforce tax liens against taxpayer’s ½ interest in real property under United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677 (1983).
Waterhouse v. United States
N/AOUTCOME: Dismissal of case in favor of client.
Plaintiffs sought to contest his liabilities as a responsible person under Section 6672 and argued that the IRS abused its discretion during the Collection Due Process hearing. United States sought to ... dismiss because only the United States Tax Court had jurisdiction over Collection Due Process claims and further opposed Plaintiff’s request for a transfer to the Tax Court.
Laber v. Dep’t of the Treasury
N/AOUTCOME: Summary judgment in favor of client.
Plaintiffs sought equitable regarding personal liability for the tax debts of their partnership.
Sygitowicz v United States
N/AOUTCOME: Partial Summary Judgment in favor of client
Plaintiff brought suit against client seeking equitable subrogation relief for tax liens filed against real property.
Dean v. IRS
N/AOUTCOME: Summary judgment in favor of client.
Defended suit by asserting that the taxpayer’s activities as a stockbroker were passive, subjecting him to passive activity loss limitations.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
