V.S. v. M.L. (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 730
N/AOUTCOME: Appellate court found a possible biological father has standing to bring an action to establish the existence of the father-child relationship even if mother’s husband is unquestionably the presumed father.
The biological father tried to establish paternity for purposes of custody and visitation. The trial court dismissed his action for lack of standing, given that the child was born into the mother’s mar ... riage to another man. The Court of Appeal reversed, finding that a change to Family Code section 7630 had provided biological fathers with standing even where a child already had a presumed father. Once this inadvertent change was brought to the attention of the family law community, it was corrected through subsequent legislation.
