Edwin Jacob Zinman

Edwin Jacob Zinman

4.5
Rating: 8.5

Licensed for 53 years

Medical malpractice Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Medical Malpractice, Car Accidents

Suite 1600, 220 Bush Street, San Francisco, CA

About Edwin

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Medical Malpractice 85%

54 years | 1,500 cases

85%
Car Accident 15%

54 years | 200 cases

15%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 53 years

State: California

Acquired: 1972

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Hawaii

State: Hawaii

Limited license to appear with local counsel

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Edwin Jacob Zinman

Suite 1600, 220 Bush Street, San Francisco, CA, 94104

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Edwin Jacob Zinman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.5 /5.0

8 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (8) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Trustworthiness

Posted by anonymous | May 14, 2015 | Medical Malpractice

Former female client

Mr. Zinman was admitted as a PRO HAC VICE on my sig dental malpractice in Virginia, and I subsequently filed non-suit shortly after Mr. Zinman and my attorney released the designation of experts testimony, since they never allowed me to review any of the dental records that the dentist presented, the...y never deposed any of the former employees that I recommended that had significant information, nor did they explain how they arrived at their decision which was contrary to my deposition as well as my excellent dental expert's opinion (specialist in Prosthodontics).. Specifically, the dentist who also has a law degree destroyed my entire oral health in 10 years time, in which he impulsively extracted of all of my 2nd molars without x-rays and informed consent, which also resulted in significant bone loss to my lower jaw area; however, the dentist never acknowledged the bone loss. During the 10 years of treatment, I did not have an ability to chew my foods from 2003 until my Board-Certified Prosthodontist restored my oral health in June 2013. This dentist extracted a total of 9 teeth w/o x-rays and informed consent: #29, #13, #10, # 5, #17, #20, #30, #31, and #15. The dentist also deliberately w/h my first 3 treatments beginning 8-28-02, 9-18-02, 10-2-02, for litigation purposes and fraudulently posted these tx's to my former dentist's record,previously retired. The dentist also usd former dentist's pt inform sheet with my name on it and crossed/o date and egregiously changed my husband's first treatment with him to my former chart and noted recent hx diabetes. This dentist also added add tx's to my former dental chart and then deleted billing record. Although I testified to this, and sent emails requesting a document examiner, my requests were ignored. Thus, the dentist did not present my attorney with all of my treatments and he presented false interrogatories. When the dentist was deposed, Mr. Zinman only asked dentist if he treated me at my former dentist's office, which he falsely testified he had, but that he did not remember the treatment. No further questions were presented by my counsel. The dentist also performed multiple root canals that were faulty unbeknownst to me that caused serious dental infections and bacterial infections resulting in endocarditis and residual heart valve residuals; however, no x-rays were presented in support of the root canals. I had 39 documented return dental trips that I made to this dentist's office for faulty crowns cracking and falling out, but at no time was this ever discussed with him either. In addition, the dentist placed a dollop of glue on my one implant without connecting it and then placed an open margin bridge over it that resulted in add'l inflamm (pus infection), bone loss, and the implant was left in place but no longer functioning as an implant. This dentist also kept me in temporaries from 2-25-06 until 2009, 2010, and as a result all of my teeth had decay on them. As such, he placed crowns over decay and the crowns had over hanging margins, which resulted in add'l bacterial infections. It should also be noted that this dentist only presented 3 x-rays taken in 2003, 2005, but no x-rays taken after crowns placed. Also, this dentist also alleged all of his laboratory receipts were destroyed by sprinkler system and when Mr. Zinman asked him if he attempted to obtain dup's after being notified of my complaint he stated he had not. Although the burden shld have shifted to the dentist, Mr. Zinman bent over backwrds and agred to obtain records for last 2 years; but,, no recds rec'd. Mr. Zinman also assesed me with med induced xerostomia to lessen the damges, which I do not....just the opposite drool all of time and he dismissed 1/2 of my tx's finding 1-30-06 as the date he fell below standard of care despite the fact it was a false date inserted by the dentist. The def also chargd me more than $60 thous, but falsely testified it was $43,000.

Posted by anonymous | June 29, 2009 | Medical Malpractice

Dr. Zinman is a one of a kind, the hardest working attorney in the industry.

Dr. Zinman represented me in a dental malpractice case when no other attorney in my state would. He is not only a top notch attorney but also one who truely cares about his clients and the harm that was done to them. He ALWAYS had my best interest at heart and his fee was NEVER a part of his concer...n. He will always answer your questions (there is no big black hole like with many others), he'll keep you informed and will allow you to make decisions based upon his legal guidance. I don't think more than a handful of days (in over 2 years) ever went by that I didn't hear from him, including weekends. To me, he has forever negated the stereotype of what the public thinks of attorneys. I could not have found a more qualified, more compassionate attorney or friend. I didn't realize how well connected and respected he was until the day I went to my state dental school with him and saw students and faculty tripping all over themselves to meet him! That was when I realized that he is not just any attorney who takes dental malpractice cases but instead a well respected dentist who is also a well respected attorney. As it was recently said in a prominent dental publication, "The last thing you ever want to get is a subpoena from Edwin Zinman". I second that. I am priviledged to have had him on my side and to be able to consider him a friend. His entire staff is as professional and caring as he. They just don't come any better.

See All Client Reviews

Edwin Jacob Zinman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Edwin
Karlie M. Gabour headshot
Karlie Gabour

Medical malpractice lawyer | Mar 16

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mr. Zinman practices law at a level beyond most of my peers. He is diligent and efficient in his representation of clients. More importantly, his communication skills and ability to respond in a timely manner to any and all requests for information is above and beyond what I have ever experienced with any lawyer. I highly recommend Mr. Zinman and would refer any person injured seeking representation in a medical malpractice or personal injury case in California."

Kathleen G Burke headshot
Kathleen Burke

Medical malpractice lawyer | Jun 01

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I had the pleasure of working on a dental malpractice case in Virginia with Ed. His experience and expertise both as a lawyer and a dentist were invaluable. We were able to achieve a great result for our client. I would welcome the opportunity to work with again and give him my endorsement. If you have a substantial case you should contact Ed!"

View All Endorsements
Clark Seegmiller headshot
Clark Seegmiller

Wrongful death lawyer

Karlie M. Gabour headshot
Karlie Gabour

Wrongful death lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.5 (Excellent)

Work Experience

1973 - Present

Owner, Law Office of Edwin J Zinman, DDS JD, Inc.

1980 - 1996

Lecturer, UC San Francisco, School of Dentistry

1964 - 1966

Chariman, Department of Periodontics, Beth Israel Hospital

Associations

American Academy of Periodontology

American Dental Association

California Dental Association

San Francisco Dental Society

Consumer Attorneys of California

Journal of Dental Practice Administration

Associate Editor

California Society of Periodontists

Vice-President and Secretary

California Academy of Periodontology

Secretary

Consumer Attorneys of California

Secretary

American Association for Justice

San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association

Board of Directors

Education

1972

University of California, Hastings College of the Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1964

New York University

Board Eligibility

1962

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh

BS - Bachelor of Science

1962

Univ of Pittsburgh

DDS - Doctor of Dental Surgery

Speaking Engagements

2010

California Dental Association Annual Meeting Millennium Dental Technologies – The ABCs of Informed Consent

2010

California Dental Association

ABC's of Informed Consent

2009

World Congress of Minimally Invasive Dentistry Caries

2009

California Dental Association Annual Meeting The ABCs of Informed Consent

Publications

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution