C.C. v. Apria Healthcare
Mar 09, 2015OUTCOME: Settled for $750,000.00
Consumer alleged that Apria violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by placing unsolicited calls to consumers' cellular telephones.
Arroyo Grande, CA
Consumer protection Lawyer at Arroyo Grande, CA
Practice Areas: Consumer Protection
OUTCOME: Settled for $750,000.00
Consumer alleged that Apria violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by placing unsolicited calls to consumers' cellular telephones.
OUTCOME: Case Settled for $1.8 million
Consumer alleged that Nelnet recorded confidential telephonic communications without consumer's knowledge and/or consent.
OUTCOME: Kazerouni Law Group, APC defeated Motions to Dismiss lodged by each defendant
Consumer alleges that Dunning Law Firm induced consumer to enter into a settlement agreement on behalf of First National Bank of Omaha but both defendants have continued collection efforts in violation ... of consumer protection statutes.
OUTCOME: Class Settlement in the appoximate amount of $14,000,000.00
Class Action alleging that Wells Fargo violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
OUTCOME: Pending - Kazerouni Law Group defeated Rabobank's Demurrer
Consumers allege that Rabobank has engaged in illegal debt collection practices by unilaterally refusing to collect Consumers' mortgage payments
OUTCOME: Settled
Consumer alleged that Allied Collection Services, Inc. violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; and, Telephone Consumer Protection Act by initiatin ... g a substantial number of telephonic communications to consumer's cellular telephone prior to 8:00 a.m.
OUTCOME: Case Settled for $2.75 million
Consumer alleged that FIA Card Services violated California Penal Code § 632 by recording confidential communications with said consumer's knowledge and/or consent.
OUTCOME: Case Dismissed
Asset Acceptance alleged that consumer breached a contract with original creditor.
OUTCOME: Case Dismissed
Midland Funding alleged that consumer breached a contract with original creditor.
OUTCOME: Consumer defeated Motion to Dismiss
Consumer alleged defendant unlawfully recorded confidential telephonic communications with consumer.