Aaron David Fhima

Aaron David Fhima

3.4
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 12 years

Lemon law Lawyer at Dana Point, CA
Practice Areas: Lemon Law, Personal Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, Car Accidents

34188 Pacific Coast Hwy, Dana Point, CA

About Aaron

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 5 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 12 years

State: California

Acquired: 2014

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Neale & Fhima, LLP

34188 Pacific Coast Hwy, Dana Point, CA, 92629

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Aaron David Fhima's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.4 /5.0

5 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (5) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 3
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 2
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 reviews | Case Results

Posted by Cliff | August 29, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Poor Communication and Case Management

This was, without question, the worst experience we have ever had with a legal representative. Based on our experience with Neale & Fhima handling our CFMOTO lemon law case, we would not recommend this firm. The biggest problem was a persistent lack of communication, organization, and basic guidance... throughout our representation. We repeatedly had to contact the firm ourselves just to find out what was happening with our case, what the next step was, and what they needed from us. We should not have had to constantly ask our own attorneys, “What happens next?” Yet that became a recurring part of our experience. Rather than the firm proactively managing our case and guiding us through the process, we frequently felt like we were managing the process ourselves. We had to follow up, ask for updates, identify what still needed to be done, and repeatedly request instructions. Even when we specifically asked what we needed to do, the answers were often vague or incomplete. One of the most unacceptable situations occurred when the attorney handling our case left the firm. We were not proactively notified that our attorney had left, we were not clearly told who was taking over, and we were not provided with an organized transition of our case. We had to contact the firm ourselves to figure out what was happening and who was now responsible for representing us. In our opinion, that is a fundamental case-management failure. A client should never be left wondering who is handling their legal matter because their assigned attorney departed and nobody adequately communicated the transition. Unfortunately, things did not improve as we approached the end of the case. Even while trying to finalize the settlement, we struggled to get clear instructions about something as basic as how and where to surrender the vehicle and how to properly complete the required paperwork. We specifically asked for direction and still found ourselves trying to figure out the process and then going back to the firm for clarification. At that point, our frustration was significant. After going through an entire lemon law case, we expected the attorneys handling it to have a clear process for bringing the matter to completion and to provide their clients with straightforward instructions. Instead, even the final steps required unnecessary back-and-forth and effort on our part. This review is not about one unanswered email, one missed telephone call, or simply being unhappy with the outcome of our case. It reflects the overall experience we had throughout the representation. The pattern was consistent: very little proactive communication, repeatedly having to contact the firm ourselves, vague or incomplete instructions, poor communication when our handling attorney left, and continued difficulty getting clear direction even at the final settlement and vehicle-surrender stage. We understand that attorneys have multiple clients and that there may be periods when there is nothing new to report. That was not the issue. Our problem was that we routinely felt responsible for determining what needed to happen next and then pursuing the firm for answers. We retained attorneys because we expected them to know the process, manage our case, communicate important developments, and tell us clearly what we needed to do. We did not expect to have to continually manage the communication and progression of our own legal matter. The fact that the CFMOTO matter ultimately moved toward resolution does not erase the experience we had getting there. A successful legal representation involves more than eventually reaching the end of a case. Clients should also be kept informed, given clear instructions, and have confidence that someone is actively managing their matter. We did not have that confidence here. This was the worst experience we have ever had with a law firm, and we would definitely not retain Neale & Fhima again. We cannot recommend this firm to others.

Posted by Michael | August 06, 2024 | Hired Attorney

A Terrible Experience, But Maybe They’ll Do Better

I’ve unfortunately had a terrible experience with Neale & Fhima. My initial contact began years ago, and I wholeheartedly believe it’s because of the severe lack of attention and care to my case that I’m still awaiting settlement. Intake was quick and easy, but the rest? Well, the rest has been h...ell on earth, in my personal opinion. I don’t feel like ANY urgency has been applied to my case. I feel like just a number - the biggest fear a client could have. I signed a settlement agreement months ago and I never feel like any progress has been made on my case until I contact this “firm” requesting an update. At that point, emails are suddenly exchanged and I’m then forwarded a response from Defense……a response that would have been furnished far sooner if Neale & Fhima performed adequate follow-up without the urging of clients with long overdue settlements. Personally, I would never hire Neale & Fhima if I could begin this process again.

Posted by Amberlee | September 27, 2018 | Hired Attorney

Fast and Great service

I hired them to help with my Lemon car. They are amazing! They took care of everything so I didn’t have to worry. The whole case was settled in two months. I was always kept in the loop of what was going on. I am very happy with their services and will definitely reccomend them.

Posted by Natasha | August 26, 2016 | Hired Attorney

Excellent Service & Results

I first contacted Aaron after having spoken to several other indifferent and pricey attorneys. He reviewed my case and was determined to get the best settlement for me. Aaron is a powerful advocate who cares about his clients and their needs. Whenever I had a question, he was very responsive and ...was sure to explain every detail thoroughly. He kept me informed throughout the progress of my case and was intelligent and practical with his approach. His determination and extensive experience allowed me to settle my case without having to go to court (which saved me time and energy). I have worked with other attorneys, but my experience with Mr. Fhima was by far the best. I highly recommend the Neale and Fhima firm.

Posted by Ray | August 24, 2016

Highly Skilled

Aaron is a caring and dedicated attorney with a track record for successfully obtaining results for his clients. He is genuine and respectful with clients over the course of his representation. He is familiar with all aspects of civil trials, making him a competent attorney to represent clients throu...gh mediation, arbitration, or trial.

See All Client Reviews

Aaron David Fhima's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Aaron
Ramin Montakab headshot
Ramin Montakab

Wrongful death lawyer | Sep 11

Relationship: Friend

"I endorse this lawyer."

Brenda Coleman headshot
Brenda Coleman

Unknown lawyer | Sep 10

Relationship: Co-worker

"Aaron has a true passion for plaintiff personal injury work. He is dedicated, knowledgeable, and trustworthy. I have no doubt he will continue to make a positive impact in fighting for his clients."

Kyle A. Fellenz headshot
Kyle Fellenz

Lemon law lawyer | Aug 26

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Matthew Edwin Neale headshot
Matthew Neale

Personal injury lawyer | Aug 25

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Andrew R. Myers headshot
Andrew Myers

Spinal cord injury lawyer | Feb 22

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Philip J. Layfield headshot
Philip Layfield

Brain injury lawyer | Feb 19

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Brandon Lane Wyman headshot
Brandon Wyman

Brain injury lawyer | Feb 09

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Andrew Corlett Schuh headshot
Andrew Schuh

Brain injury lawyer | Feb 04

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Christopher Michael Blanchard headshot
Christopher Blanchard

Spinal cord injury lawyer | Feb 02

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Steven Eric Weinberger headshot
Steven Weinberger

Wrongful death lawyer | Feb 01

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Eber Nicholas Bayona headshot
Eber Bayona

Spinal cord injury lawyer | Feb 01

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Valerie Lissa Bradbury headshot
Valerie Bradbury

Spinal cord injury lawyer | Feb 01

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Paloma Lydia Picasso headshot
Paloma Picasso

Personal injury lawyer | Feb 01

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Shannon Amber Guevara headshot
Shannon Guevara

Personal injury lawyer | Feb 01

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Matthew Edwin Neale headshot
Matthew Neale

Personal injury lawyer

Brenda Coleman headshot
Brenda Coleman

Medical malpractice lawyer

Kyle A. Fellenz headshot
Kyle Fellenz

Litigation lawyer

Mark Bloom headshot
Mark Bloom

Personal injury lawyer

Andrew R. Myers headshot
Andrew Myers

Personal injury lawyer

Brandon Lane Wyman headshot
Brandon Wyman

Litigation lawyer

Christopher Michael Blanchard headshot
Christopher Blanchard

Personal injury lawyer

Philip J. Layfield headshot
Philip Layfield

Wrongful death lawyer

Valerie Lissa Bradbury headshot
Valerie Bradbury

Motorcycle accident lawyer

Eber Nicholas Bayona headshot
Eber Bayona

Civil rights lawyer

Andrew Corlett Schuh headshot
Andrew Schuh

Personal injury lawyer

Steven Eric Weinberger headshot
Steven Weinberger

Personal injury lawyer

Shannon Amber Guevara headshot
Shannon Guevara

Personal injury lawyer

Paloma Lydia Picasso headshot
Paloma Picasso

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2018

Admitee, US Central District Court

2018

Admitee, American Association for Justice

2018

Admitee, Association of Trial Lawyers of America

2018

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2018

Lifetime Member, Best Lawyers in America

2018

Top 40 Under 40, National Trial Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2017

Admitee, Association of Trial Lawyers of America

2016

Super Lawyer Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2016

Admitee, Association of Trial Lawyers of America

2016

Admitee, US Central District Court

2014

Admitee, State Bar of California

2012

Finalist, 2012 INADR International Law School ADR and Mediation Tournament

Work Experience

2016 - Present

Partner, Neale & Fhima, LLP

2014 - 2016

Trial Attorney, Law Office's of Aaron D. Fhima

Associations

2016 - Present

Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles

Member

2016 - Present

American Association for Justice

Member

2016 - Present

Orange County Trial Lawyers Association

Member

2014 - Present

Orange County Bar Association

Member

2014 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

2014 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Consumer v. Auto Manufacturer

$188,000 verdict for the consumer, which was the total cost of the vehicle, this figure does not include attorney fees and expenses recovered

Automobile v. Commercial Automobile Truck

$155,000 settlement

Minor v. School District

$70,000 settlement

Consumer v. Luxury Auto Manufacturer

Settlement: Statutory Repurchase ("Buyback") Under California's Lemon Law

Consumer v. Auto Manufacturer

Settlement: Statutory Repurchase ("Buyback") Under California's Lemon Law

Consumer v. Auto Manufacturer

Settlement: Statutory Repurchase ("Buyback") Under California's Lemon Law

Consumer v. Auto Manufacturer

Settlement: Statutory Repurchase ("Buyback") Under California's Lemon Law

Consumer v. Auto Manufacturer

Settlement: Statutory Repurchase ("Buyback") Under California's Lemon Law

Consumer v. German Auto Manufacturer

Settlement: Statutory Repurchase ("Buyback") Under California's Lemon Law

Consumer v. Motorcycle Manufacturer

Settlement: Statutory Repurchase ("Buyback") Under California's Lemon Law

Corporation v. Corporation

$830,000 Verdict for Clients

Premises Liability: Neighbor v. Neighbor

$300,000 Settlement for Clients

Nurse v. Patient

$195,000 Settlement for Client

See More Legal Cases

Education

2013

Tulane Univ Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

2008

University of Southern California

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution