We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Emily Madueno focuses her practice on eminent domain and inverse condemnation matters. She is experienced in advising both landowner and public agency clients in all aspects of an eminent domain matter. Ms. Madueno also represents and advises clients in land use litigation matters, including environmental disputes.
1
Practice Area
18 years
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: California
Acquired: 2007
No misconduct found
650 Town Center Drive, Suite 550, Costa Mesa, CA, 92626
Not Yet Reviewed
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
Unknown lawyer
2013 - Present
Partner, Murphy & Evertz LLP
2010 - 2013
Associate, Murphy & Evertz LLP
2007 - 2010
Associate, Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps
2006 - 2006
Summer Associate, Holland & Knight
2017 - Present
International Right-of-Way Association Chapter 57President
2007 - Present
Federalist SocietyMember
2007 - Present
Orange County Bar AssociationMember
2007 - Present
International Right of Way AssociationMember
2016 - 2017
International Right-of-Way Association Chapter 57President-Elect
2015 - 2016
International Right-of-Way Association Chapter 57Treasurer
2014 - 2015
Chapter 57 International Right of Way AssociationSecretary
The City valued just compensation for the expert exchange at $6.665 million. The case settled for $15.4 million.
Caltrans ultimately agreed to pay $6,440,000 for full takes of two of the parcels, preserving the owners’ ability to seek compensation for the taking of, and damages to, the third parcel.
The case settled for $6 million to Mentone.
Caltrans initially offered $84,000. The case settled a few weeks before the jury trial was to begin for total compensation of $4.6 million to our client.
After two partial abandonments by Caltrans, the Court awarded our client litigation expenses and the case settled favorably for our client.
Bay City Partners LLC obtained settlement worth up to $2 million, plus the City’s cooperation in further entitlements for the property.
Bay City Partners LLC obtained settlement worth up to $2 million, plus the City’s cooperation in further entitlements for the property.
After establishing the necessity for a full take, the case settled for $25.5 million, while preserving the client’s ability to seek substantial additional precondemnation damages and reimbursement of environmental remediation offsets.
The District initially offered $410,000. The case settled for total just compensation of $1,350,000 for our clients.
The case settled one week before the jury trial was to begin for total compensation of $7.85 million to our client.
Our team negotiated a lost rent agreement which insulated our client from any loss of income during the litigation. The case then settled on the eve of jury trial for total compensation of $6.2 million to our client.
2007
J.D.
2004
B.A.
2014
How Fast Food Restaurants are Impacted by Public Projects
2011
Surplus Property Disposition: How to Win the Game for Your Agency . . . And Stay Out of Jail
2011
Square Pegs, Round Holes, Easy Targets: Valuing Special Use Property In Eminent Domain
2009
2019: Two Visions of the Next Ten Years in Eminent Domain and Public Acquisitions
2009
Clear, Simple, and Wrong? The Rules on Environmental Contamination in Eminent Domain
2012
2012
2011
2011
2010
2010
2009
2009
2009
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2007
English