Rachel A. King

Rachel A. King

4.2
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 11 years

Wills and living wills Lawyer at Wildomar, CA
Practice Areas: Wills & Living Wills, Probate, Trusts ... +4 more

34859 Frederick Street, Suite 108, Wildomar, CA

About Rachel

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 250-300 per hour

Contingency

25%-35%


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 11 years

State: California

Acquired: 2014

Active

No misconduct found

Location

King Law Firm

34859 Frederick Street, Suite 108, Wildomar, CA, 92595

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Rachel A. King's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.2 /5.0

5 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (5) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Communication Style

Posted by Ben | May 04, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Handle Unprofessionally

I don’t post reviews too often, but I had such a bad experience here that I felt the need to leave a review. I had chosen this firm after having free consultations with many places. I was told that the firm had dealt with cases like mine before and that it would be a very easy divorce. Their price se...emed fair compared to other places and I was told that I most likely would get some money back from the original estimate/retainer. The timeframe for completing the divorce also seemed good; I had been told I would be in the waiting period in about 3-4 months. Based on what I was told by the firm I went with their services. I started the process in February 2022. In July 2022, after things were already taking longer than expected, and I was not receiving updates to why there was a delay, I talked with the attorney on my case and was told that within three weeks my case should be in default, which would have been around the end of August. August comes and goes, and I hear nothing, so on September 9 I called for an update and was told that the default would now be filed in a week or two. To make a very long story short, they got rid of the attorneys that were on my case and then totally forgot about my case. As a result, the timeframe to enter the default had passed and therefore they had to refile it. The worst part is that they were not even aware that my case was never handed off to another attorney until I called wondering why nothing was happening on my case. Furthermore, the person I spoke to on the phone tried to give me the run around, lying to me, like everything was happening the way it was supposed to, until she finally had to admit that they completely forgot about my case. This made the rest of the process very confusing and take much longer than what I was originally told, as they basically had to start the process over. I received a call from Ms. King, the owner of the firm, apologizing for their mistake but not offering anything to make right their mistake. I wasn’t sure what I had been charged for from the original attorney and now, with it needing to be redone if I would be charged twice for the same services. After combing through the invoices, I did find a few things that were double charged that they did refund me for, but I had to go back through the receipts and look very carefully. At this point I was already to the original estimate. I am aware that the initial estimate is only an estimate, but in the end, it cost me 3 times as much as I was quoted, which is frustrating after being told that I would probably get money refunded to me from the original amount I was first quoted. This was an uncontested divorce with all terms mutually agreed upon by me and my ex, so not complicated. In addition, it also took almost 3 times as long as what I was originally told, mainly due to the firm dropping my case after the attorneys working on it were let go. When I addressed this issue with them, about how it was costing much more and taking much more time than what I was initially told during my consultation, primarily due to their mess up with dropping my case, they would not take any responsibility or compensate me in any way. Their reasoning was that they let the two attorneys that messed my case up go so they were not responsible for what those attorneys told me. How can a firm not be responsible for what their lawyers say just because they fired them? How can a firm not take any responsibility as far as trying to make things right after completely forgetting about someone’s case? Finally, how can a firm charge their client for the time it takes to redo paperwork and filings due to their lawyer’s/staff’s negligence, regardless that they fired those lawyers? In the end I felt completely taken advantage of. Did I expect my case to be handled for free? No, of course not, but I did expect my case to be handled professionally, which it was not, and no effort was given to adjust for the firm’s errors nor was anyone fort

See All Client Reviews

Rachel A. King's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Rachel
Patrick O. King headshot
Patrick King

Litigation lawyer | Feb 18

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I highly recommend Rachel King. I worked on a case that crossed jurisdiction from Nevada where I practice to California. I requested, on behalf of my Client, assistance from Rachel King to handle the California issues. Rachel was very quick to respond. Rachel took on the matter without hesitation and did an outstanding job. I count Rachel King as one of the top lawyers in California. Patrick Owen King, Esq."

Nicole Jenae D'Ambrogi headshot
Nicole D'Ambrogi

General practice lawyer | Mar 30

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Rachel King is a very dedicated lawyer. She always strives to provide her clients with superior representation. The thing I admire most about Rachel is her ability to connect with her clients on a personal level."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Honors

2025

Ones to Watch, Best Lawyers

2024

Ones to Watch, Best Lawyers

2021

Best Lawyer, Expertise

2015

40 Under Forty, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce

2014

Magna Cum Laude, Thomas Jefferson School of Law

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Owner/ attorey, King Law Firm

2015 - 2015

Adjunct Professor, California State University San Marcos

Associations

2016 - Present

Murrieta Chamber of Commerce

Ambassador

2015 - Present

TEAM

2015 - Present

American Bar Association

2014 - Present

State Bar of California

2014 - Present

Riverside County Bar Association

2014 - Present

Southwest Bar Association

2014 - Present

Murrieta Chamber of Commerce

Education

2014

Thomas Jefferson School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2011

California State University, San Marcos

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2025

Riverside County Bar Association, Probate Section

CLE Taught Signs of Domestic Violence in Guardianships

2025

Riverside County Bar Association

2025 Quarterly Meeting for Riverside County Bar Association Attendee/Participant

2024

Riverside County Bar Association

2024 Quarterly Meeting for Riverside County Bar Association Attendee/Participant

2015

Murrieta School of Business

Business Mistakes NOT to Make

2015

Murrieta School of Business

Business Entities

2014

American Career College

Healthcare Law

2013

American Career College

Healthcare Law

Publications

2015

Ask the Expert Murrieta Community Magazine

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution