Jonathan Andrew Muenkel

Jonathan Andrew Muenkel

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 26 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Encinitas, CA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Licensing, Contracts & Agreements ... +2 more

1106 Second Street, Suite 831, Encinitas, CA

About Jonathan

Biography

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 11 years

State: California

Acquired: 2014

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in New York for 23 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2002

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Licensed in Virginia for 26 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 1999

Associate

No misconduct found

Location

NorthStar Law Group

1106 Second Street, Suite 831, Encinitas, CA, 92024

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Jonathan Andrew Muenkel's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

5 star 0
4 star 0
3 star 0
2 star 0
1 star 0

Jonathan Andrew Muenkel's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Jonathan
Pejman D Kharrazian headshot
Pejman Kharrazian

Intellectual property lawyer | Mar 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jonathan brings his big firm background to his practice, which is a great asset to his business clients. Jonathan is a thoughtful and seasoned attorney, and I endorse him without reservation."

Jordan F. Kohler headshot
Jordan Kohler

Intellectual property lawyer | Oct 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jonathan is a highly experienced and effective intellectual property attorney. He has a thorough understanding of technology law, and the legal needs of both small and large businesses. I highly recommend him."

View All Endorsements
Pejman D Kharrazian headshot
Pejman Kharrazian

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2015

Best of the Bar, San Diego Business Journal

2013

Recognition of Outstanding Leadership Contribution, American Bar Association IP Section

2012

Recognition of Outstanding Leadership Contribution, American Bar Association IP Section

1999

Order of the Barristers - Outstanding Oral Advocacy, University of Richmond, The T.C. Williams School of Law

1997

Winner - Moot Court Competition, University of Richmond, The T.C. Williams School of Law

1997

Winner - Client Counseling Competition, University of Richmond, The T.C. Williams School of Law

Work Experience

2017 - Present

Founder/Partner, NorthStar Law Group

2017 - 2018

General Counsel, Pro Performance Sports (d/b/a SKLZ)

2014 - 2017

Co-Founder / Shareholder, Torrey Pines Law Group

2013 - 2013

IP Counsel, Life Technologies, Inc.

2012 - 2012

Patent Litigation and Licensing Counsel, Nantero, Inc.

2005 - 2012

Associate, Jones Day

2001 - 2005

Associate, Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto

2000 - 2000

Foreign Attorney, Bird & Bird Solicitors

Associations

2018 - Present

San Diego Sports Innovators

Legal Mentor

2015 - 2017

American Bar Association IP Section

Chair (ADR and Litigation Division)

2014 - 2016

Casa Cornelia Law Center

Volunteer Attorney

2014 - 2015

North County Bar Association

Member

2013 - 2014

Association of Corporate Counsel

IP and Litigation Committees

2010 - 2015

American Bar Association IP Section

Vice-Chair (Litigation and ADR Division)

2006 - 2012

Puppies Behind Bars

Volunteer for Service Dog Training Program

Education

1999

University of Richmond, The T. C. Williams School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

Cambridge University

1995

Miami University of Ohio

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2014

29th Annual IP Conference

Staying Up-To-Date In the World of Patent Litigation: A Year (and more) in Review

2013

28th Annual IP Conference

The Law of Patent Infringement - Staying Ahead of the Curve

2012

27th Annual IP Conference

The Document Preservation Dilemma: When is it OK or NOT OK to Destroy Documents That Might Relate to Litigation

2011

In-House Program

The Advent of Biosimilars: What you (and your clients) Should Know

2011

26th Annual IP Conference

The Advent of Biosimilars in the U.S.: Where are we now and where are we likely headed?

2010

CLE Webinar

Ariad Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly: Examining the Written Description Requirement for Patentability

2009

In-House Program

Preparing For (and Going To) Trial: What Every Litigator Should Know

2008

In-House Program

An Introduction to Section 337 Litigation Before the International Trade Commission ("ITC")

2007

In-House Program

The Implications of In re: Seagate on Willfulness & Privilege Waiver

Publications

2014

Association of Corporate Counsel, Docket Magazine US Patent Law and the Supreme Court: A Year In Review

2014

ABA IP Section Spring Conference Publication Staying Up-To-Date In The World of Patent Litigation: A Year (and more) in Review

2014

San Diego Business Journal Patent Rights Are Crucial To Local Economy

2013

ABA IP Section Spring Conference Publication The Law of Patent Infringement - Staying Ahead of the Curve

2012

ABA IP Section Spring Conference Publication The Document Preservation Dilemma: When is it OK or NOT OK to Destroy Documents That Might Relate to Litigation?

2011

Jones Day Commentary Global-Tech v. SEB: The Supreme Court Alters The Intent Requirement For Induced Infringement In Patent Cases

2011

Jones Day Commentary Therasense v. Becton Dickinson: The Federal Circuit Heightens The Standard for Proving Inequitable Conduct

2011

ABA IP Section - Landslide Magazine Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation: The Federal Circuit's Continued Efforts at Patent Damage Reform

2011

ABA IP Section 2010 Annual Review of Intellectual Property Law Developments

2010

NY State Bar Association - IP Bulletin Ariad Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly: Change to the Written Description Requirement or Simply The Status Quo?

2010

IP Magazine In the Matter of Certain Coaxial Cable Connectors: the U.S. International Trade Commission Clarifies the Domestic Industry Requirement in Patent Infringement Actions

2010

ABA IP Section - Landslide Magazine The Advent of Follow-On Biologics: A Post-Script

2009

Patent World Tyre Case Clarifies Injunction Test: Adding Tread to the Test for Preliminary Injunctions in U.S. Patent Cases

2009

ABA IP Section - Landslide Magazine The Crusade for Follow-On Biologics - The Next Wave of Pharmaceutical Patent Litigation?

2008

Patent World Patent Exhaustion is Revived and Clarified

2008

Jones Day Commentary Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics: The U.S. Supreme Court Breathes New Life Into the Patent Exhaustion Doctrine

2006

IPL Newsletter (ABA) The eBay Effect: Real Change or Status Quo? An Examination of Requests for Injunctive Relief in Patent Actions Since eBay v. MercExchange

2004

Corporate Counsel Staking A Claim In The Nanoworld

2002

National Bar Association Newsletter (Intellectual Property Law Section) Greater Access to Affordable Pharmaceuticals Act of 2002: An Impending Change to Hatch-Waxman?

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution