No Photo

Dana Allan Godfrey

1.0
Rating: 1.0

Licensed for 34 years

Lawyer at Diamond Bar, CA

324 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., Suite 194, Diamond Bar, CA

This attorney is currently not accepting new clients.
Reason: Not Practicing
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2016
See Details

About Dana

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 34 years

State: California

Acquired: 1991

Disbarred

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2016

Location

Dana A. Godfrey

324 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., Suite 194, Diamond Bar, CA, 91765

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Dana Allan Godfrey's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Case Results

Posted by anonymous | November 08, 2011 | Litigation

UNPROFESSIONAL - IRRESPONSIBLE

This attorney was referred to me (Norma Contreras-Guillen/Petitioner) by a friend who met him through the University of Phoenix when he was professor there. He started off well while he was still in his Diamond Bar office; however, he soon moved to another firm in Tustin (Hughes & Sullivan) and aban...doned his clients and office. I would go search for him at his Diamond Bar office and found that he was always closed and/or had not been seen for weeks. His office door was filled with notes and announcements from UPS, FED EX, and other clients were also looking for him. I went to other offices next door to his, in the same building, who reported that there have been many clients, Fed Ex, UPS, and others looking for Atty. Godfrey to no avail. They also noted that the landlord was asking about the hours when anyone had seen him – not seen for weeks. I kept searching for him going several times a week, different times, and dates to his office and still nothing. I also went online and found that there was another firm where his names appeared. They informed me via email that Atty. Godfrey was in the Tustin branch through Hughes & Sullivan, 660 W. First Street, Tustin, CA 92780; (714)538-5200 or (714)998-4435 FAX. I finally found him and resumed contact. His excuse was that he lost his phone and couldn’t get a hold of anyone. I asked him, well what about my file and your computer that has all my information? He just avoided the question and said, “Let’s move on.” At first I believed in him because of his knowledge of the law and divorce case experience (plus my friend kept saying he was so awesome); however, it doesn’t matter how much knowledge you have if you don’t help your clients. I retained him with a $5,000.00 fee upfront and he didn’t do much of anything after filing my petition.. We went to court several times (see Access printout) and I thought we were prepared; as per Atty. Godfrey indicated to me. However, the defense attorney brought out that Atty. Godfrey had not done any paperwork (used another word), returned her calls, mail requests, and was still waiting for the income and expense declaration she requested. All in all, the bottom message was that nothing had been done and that, in fact, we were unprepared several times. Atty. Godfrey got very upset and indicated that defense attorney had dealt an unprofessional card – and she would pay for it. However, it didn’t matter because nothing changed. Atty. Godfrey promised me that he would be doing discovery about the issues at hand and he never did anything. On the contrary, a mandatory settlement conference/trial setting scheduled for September 20, 2011 at 8:30 am, Dept. 16, was missed because Atty. Godfrey did not keep me up to date and/or communicated anything to me. I called and called, left messages on his cell phone, and emailed him prior to the date Atty. Godfrey had given me of, September 21, 2011, - still NO RESPONSE. The way I would find out what was going on schedule-wise, was because I got on the internet and through http://www.sb-court.org/Divisions/Civil/CaseInformationOnline.aspx would find out what was going on. I tried to contact Atty. Godfrey several times before September 21st to find out what we were up against and to make sure that he had something to present…(didn’t want the same scenario from the defense attorney)…to no avail. On September 21, 2011, the day of the court trial conference, I received a phone message that court had been canceled and that the hearing would be rescheduled. I had to cancel the substitute scheduled for my classes (teach high school) and wait for his call later. I did get to talk to him briefly because he was in his car driving and the call was not coming in clear in the evening of that day; however, I had several questions unanswered. I found out later on the following week that court had not been canceled and that, in fact, we (Atty. Godfrey and myself) were reported as “NO SHOWS”!!!!!

See All Client Reviews

Dana Allan Godfrey's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Dana
Jennifer Renee Posey headshot
Jennifer Posey

Family lawyer | Jan 19

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Dana is an excellent attorney! He is sharp and quick in court. He has such good manners that he can get his point across to the court and counsel with grace."

Ann Michelle Coleman headshot
Ann Coleman

Family lawyer | May 30

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Arelis Hughes headshot
Arelis Hughes

Family lawyer

Steve Ra headshot
Steve Ra

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  1.0 (Extreme Caution)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2016.

Disbarment issued in CA, 2016

updated on 06/10/2016

Disbarment is the most serious penalty for a lawyer. If this attorney is currently practicing law, you should contact the California State Bar to understand the reasons for disbarment.

Discipline with Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2015

updated on 01/20/2016

This sanction means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Discipline with Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2015

updated on 01/20/2016

This sanction means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Discipline with Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2014

updated on 01/20/2016

This sanction means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Discipline with Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2013

updated on 01/20/2016

This sanction means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Publications

1990

Journal of Juvenile Law Child Rights under 28US1953
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2016
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution