Robert Herring Wright

Robert Herring Wright

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.1

Licensed for 34 years

Appeals Lawyer at Encino, CA
Practice Areas: Appeals

15760 Ventura Boulevard, 18th Floor, Encino, CA

About Robert

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Appeals 100%

Robert Wright is a partner at Horvitz & Levy, where he has been practicing since 1999. He is a California State Bar Certified Appellate Specialist. He has presented over 30 arguments before the state and federal appellate courts.

100%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 34 years

State: California

Acquired: 1991

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Horvitz & Levy LLP

15760 Ventura Boulevard, 18th Floor, Encino, CA, 91436

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Robert Herring Wright's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Robert Herring Wright's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Robert

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Charles Forrest Kester headshot
Charles Kester

Business lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.1 (Excellent)

Honors

1991

Order of the Coif, Indiana University School of Law

1991

Magna Cum Laude, Indiana University School of Law

Associations

Los Angeles County Bar Association

Amicus Briefs Committee

Los Angeles County Bar Association

State Appellate Judicial Evaluation Committee

Sample of Legal Cases

Corenbaum v. Lampkin

Reversal of judgment awarding over $3 million in damages

Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.

Reversal of unfavorable Court of Appeal decision

Collins v. Plant Insulation Co.

Reversal of judgment awarding over $2 million in damages

Kelly v. CB & I Constructors, Inc.

Reversal of judgment awarding damages for discomfort, annoyance, and inconvenience

Perlin v. Fountain View Management, Inc.

Affirmance of trial court decision denying opposing party's request for attorney fees

See More Legal Cases

Education

1991

Indiana University School of Law at Bloomington

JD - Juris Doctor

1987

University of Virginia

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2013

24th Annual General Counsel ACIC Seminar

Appellate Update: Good News, Bad News, and Issues to Watch in Tort Liability and Beyond

Publications

2014

The Verdict Magazine (ASCDC) Howell Two Years Later: Strategies for Responding to Attempts to Circumvent a Landmark Decision

2014

Los Angeles Lawyer The Effect of Howell on Personal Injury Medical Cost Recovery

2013

11 Loyola Mar. L.J. 271 Assumption of the Risk in Boat Racing: A Study in Maritime Jurisprudence

2012

Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy, Vol. 29, Nos. 9 & 10 The Conflict over Medicare's 'Full Reimbursement' Rule

2012

Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy, Vol. 29, No. 5 Limiting Windfall Damages

2012

Association of Business Trial Lawyers, Vol. XXXIII, No. 2 Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions: A Landmark Damages Case

2012

Legal Insights, Winter Sanchez v. Strickland and the Measure of Damages in California for Past Medical Expenses

2012

The Recorder, Dec. 7 Measuring Damages to Trees and Pets

2011

Daily Journal, Dec. 27 The Five-Year Mandatory Dismissal Statute May Be Back In Vogue

2010

Verdict, Association of Southern California Defense Counsel, 3rd and 4th Quarter California Decisions - On the Books and Off: Why the Bar Should Remain Attentive to the Benefits of Seeking Both Publication and Depublication

2009

The Brief, American Bar Association, Vol. 38, No. 2 Punitive Damages Immunity of Federal Instrumentalities

2008

Cal. Civil Writ Practice, ch. 17 (Cont.Ed.Bar 4th ed.) Determining Whether to File an Appellate Court Writ Petition

2004

Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy Vol. 22, No. 1 California Court: Peer Review Recommendations Not Final

1998

American Bar Association International Antitrust Handbook
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution