No Photo

Nathan Amerberg

Licensed for 23 years

Car accident Lawyer at Reseda, CA
Practice Areas: Car Accidents

6850 Canby Ave Ste 109, Reseda, CA

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Nathan

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 23 years

State: California

Acquired: 2002

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Office of Nathan Amerberg

6850 Canby Ave Ste 109, Reseda, CA, 91335

Amerberg Law Group

20061 Saticoy St Ste 102, Winnetka, CA, 91306-2699

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Nathan Amerberg's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

2.3 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

5 star (1)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (2)

Posted by Lykos | September 30, 2025 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Loss of health, nerves, money, and time. If you don’t mind — WELCOMEL!!!

Never get involved with Amerberg Law Group if you don’t want to lose your health and nerves. Their goal is not to protect your interests but to get as much money from you as possible. Before signing the contract, Taras promised golden mountains. After signing the contract on 04/15/2025, I was sent... to a chiropractor who “coincidentally” was in the neighboring building of Taras’s office. The chiropractor prescribed electrophoresis and electric massage without any diagnosis — no MRI, no X-ray. Although Taras, Anastasia, and this chiropractor were aware that I could only sleep sitting in a chair due to severe back pain and problems with my hip joint. Although I had arranged everything with Taras, he said that my case was being handled by Madlen. But she did not answer calls, and every time I had to communicate again through Taras. After 29 days I found out that Madlen was not handling my case — I was simply misled. Taras wrote to me: “The inspector examined the car and that’s all.” When I was not given information about who was handling my case and what verdict the inspector gave after examining my car, I forbade them to sign any documents without my consent until I said YES or NO. Instead of answering my questions, on May 21 Taras wrote to me asking if I was aware that he could close my case at any time without my consent. When I again asked him to answer my questions, on May 22 I received a message: “I closed your case. Find another lawyer” — without any explanation. On June 9 Natan Amerberg stated that now my case was “definitely” being handled by Madlen. When I asked why the employees misled, ignored, and deceived me, I received the answer: “I am not responsible for them.” I repeated that they are his employees, but again received the same answer. The MRI was done only after 58 days. Two areas were skipped completely, and where it was done, the MRI showed serious injuries. After another 11 days, when no one contacted me, I wrote to Madlen asking her to explain why and on what grounds they treated me like this. She again did not respond, and later I received a letter dated June 24 in which Natan Amerberg informed me that my case was closed. The result of cooperation with Amerberg Law Group: bill for MRI — $3,500, my car was sent to a paid parking lot without my consent — bill $2,500 + $45 for each day of downtime, treatment has still not been appointed. I refused to attend the chiropractor, directly emphasizing that I would no longer go without a diagnosis only for the sake of receipts so that they could later present them to the insurance company. The car is still standing in the paid parking lot, nothing has been resolved for me with the insurance company of the at-fault driver, and what they decided for themselves — I have no idea, since my case was refused to be given back to me. I have evidence for everything I have stated. I thought that the laws were written equally for everyone. But, as it turns out, not for them.

Posted by Emily | July 2, 2020 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Highly Recommend

I have known Mr. Amemberg for many years. I have consulted with him on many occasions concerning personal injury cases and I have found him to be very professional and knowledgeable. He gets personally involved with his clients and works diligently to resolve every case with compassion. He follows th...e rules of law while making sure his clients receive the full benefits afforded to them. I appreciate his honesty and dedication while serving the citizens of our community. I have referred many family and friends to Nathan regarding their legal needs and he has served them well. Thanks Nathan you are the best.

Posted by anonymous | March 15, 2011

Stay Away

My car was totalled 7/29/09.The collision company recommended him highly. I brought all my paperwork to Mr. Amerberg in Sept of 2009. His paralegal Jessica took care of everything. It is now 3/15/11. Nothing has been settled. I call and it takes days to receive a callback and when I get one, it i...s always from Jessica and there is always an excuse as to why there is a hold up. I ask for copies of correspondence and never receive any. I actually think they have lost my paperwork. Anyway, I'm reporting him to the Bar. Don't Use this Attorney!

See All Client Reviews

Nathan Amerberg's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Nathan

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

N/A

Southwestern University School of Law

N/A

University of California - Irvine

Languages

Spanish

Russian

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution