Todd Richard Miller

Todd Richard Miller

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review

Licensed for 28 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Copyright Application, Trademark Application, Patent Application

555 South Flower Street, 50th Floor, Los Angeles, CA

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Todd

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 28 years

State: California

Acquired: 1997

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Jones Day

555 South Flower Street, 50th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90071

Law Offices of Todd Richard Miller

221 E Walnut St Ste 227, Pasadena, CA, 91101-1554

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Todd Richard Miller's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Todd Richard Miller's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Todd

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Associations

American Bar Association

Member

Los Angeles County Bar Association

Member

Education

1997

George Washington University National Law Center

LL.M - Master of Laws

1995

Thomas M. Cooley Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

University of Florida

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2004

University of California Los Angeles

Due Diligence in Intellectual Property Transactions

2001

Lyon & Lyon, LLP

IP Overview and Patent Drafting 101

2000

Lyon & Lyon, LLP

IP Overview and Patent Drafting 101

1999

Lyon & Lyon, LLP

IP Overview and Patent Drafting 101

1999

Patent Resources Institute

Patent Claim Drafting

Publications

2007

Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal New Procedures at the USPTO: The Risks and Rewards of Accelerated Patent Examination within 12 Months

2004

LAIPLA Bulletin, Issue 16 What is a Markman Hearing

2004

LAIPLA Bulletin, Issue 18 Inherent Anticipation: The Downfall of Recognition

2004

86 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 931 The 'Doctrine of Prosecution Disclaimer' in Construing Patent Claims

2004

American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Patented Compounds Inherently Coproduced as Trace Impurities: Issues of Inherent Anticipation and Literal Infringement

2003

Patent & Trademark Off. Society 791 Practical Tips on Enforcing and Defending Patents

1996

37 J.L. TECH. 1; 78 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 734 The Same Effect: United States Provisional Patent Applications and Paris Convention Priority Rights

1996

78 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 443 The International Suture: A Comparative Approach to Patenting Methods of Medical Treatment

1995

35 J.L. & Tech. 261 The Public's Right to Know? Or a Red-Tape Nightmare?: Demanding Best Mode Disclosure to be Updated

1993

2 University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal 89 Motivation and Set-Size: In re Bell Provides a Link Between Chemical and Biochemical Patent Claims
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution