Cameron Astiazaran Davis

I have used this firm multiple times in the past few years regarding both family court issues/custody as well as for a will/living trust. Ms. Astiazaran was my attorney for a family court issue and I would highly recommend her to anyone seeking representation in a like matter. She is professional ...and respectful, and knowledgeable in her field. She knows how the system and the courts work locally and based on your situation will work with you to adjust the approach needed for your case. I greatly appreciate how she took the time to explain things to me when I had a question, that she is quick respond, and will stay on top of things. I've worked with many lawyers over the years professionally, I wouldn't let many of them handle a case for me personally, however I would happily use her again if I needed future representation. Dave Workman, handled my will/living trust. Mr. Workman was very knowledgeable, detailed oriented, thorough, as well as professional. I would also feel confident utilizing his services again if I needed to.

Cameron is a pleasant and polite person who who fails to provide service she was hired for. First court date after recieving no support for 2 1/2 months and with 100% custody of 2 children we appeared on an emergency travel basis for my daughters to visit their termanally ill grandmother. I was enco...uraged to subjugate to the non-supporting parent efforts to further prohibit me from earning income by by picking custody time already covered in daycare. When I refused and wanted to see the judge to establish the travel and support respondent backed down and agreed to the time share. I still wanted temporary support established. Cameron pushed me using fear that the judge would say my kids could not go. I cannot see any posible reason that the judge would refuse when the mother abandoned them, refused to support the children and paid nothing. She pushed and I gave in. In doing so I stipulated to a temporary agreement that establishes false facts under duress later thrown in my face. This failure to establish my support claim allowed the respondent to establish a stipulated fraudulent support and kick-back with her ex 11 days prior to our second appearance and in first position so that her income was reduced by the fraud prior to calculating support for my 2 children, On our 2nd appearance I had been told the guideline support was in the $900-950 range. My parents had been helping and subsidizingrent and hjad been paying for my grandmothers cancer treatment and the financial stress caused family problems. She was informed of our arguement the day before court .On the sept 6th date Cameron went into chambers and returned and presented me "THE COURT'S ORDER" in which because the respondent said I made an amount 3x my income and said she made $2400 the Commisioner split the difference on my income, deducted the $400 fraud support and calculated $430 for my two children. To top that off my children are starting school the following day and the order gives me only $215 for sept. In the next 4 months I recieve 1150 in support and $4700 in attorney billing, and cant pay rent or afford the attorney costing $100 per month in C/C bill. January I have no attorney, parents have been forced to pay 5000 in rent and see the commissioner and complain about the abuse and failure to address the childrens needs and thr fraudulent numbers she used and was told that she had nothing to do with that and she just signed the stipulation I agreed to and was given by my attorney. Its been 18 months I have been trying to correct this. We have now lost our home of 16yrs, my daughters who have been with me since birth live with my parents. My highly gifted high achieving honor roll child who started reading befor 3 is struggling in school, highly depressed after losing her primary bond and stability - DADDY Elkins Amendment's were enacted by the judicial counsel after the panel found widespread violations of civil rights within the court system. One being decisions made without the important information or even the presence of the party. This is a procedural Due Process Violation and violation of the 14th Amendment The Fourth District recently observed that "making an order in an unreported chambers conference deprives the parents of their right under section 4057, subdivision (b) to have the family court at least consider whether the guideline result should be varied under the circumstances of their particular case." (In re Marriage of Hall, supra, 81 Cal.App.4th at p. 320, original italics.) Elkins v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1337 held that the lack of live testimony deprives family law litigants of due process protections. Cameron Astiazaran still swears she has earned her money and provided quality representation and admits to doing nothing wrong dispite documented letters from her stating what the commissioner "ORDERED" She cost my family our home, caused permanent damage to my kids and ruined my finances