We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
About Chaka
Practice Areas
This attorney has not specified their practice areas.
Fees and Rates
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in California for 20 years
State: California
Acquired: 2005
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2018
Location
Law Offices of Chaka H Grossman
The Penthouse Ste 3, 9025 Wilshire Blvd, Beverly Hills, CA, 90211
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
Chaka H Grossman's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
Not Yet Reviewed
Chaka H Grossman's Lawyer Endorsements
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
Experience
Professional misconduct
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2018.
Interim suspension after conviction issued in CA, 2018
updated on 05/07/2018This means the attorney temporarily lost his or her license to practice law while the State investigates whether the attorney should be disciplined. The suspension typically expires when the investigation is resolved.
Discipline with Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2017
updated on 05/23/2017This sanction means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.
Discipline, Probation; no Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2015
updated on 01/20/2016This sanction means the attorney had a suspension placed on hold (and ultimately removed) by complying with certain requirements.
Education
N/A
Univ of San Diego SOL
law
N/A
California St Univ Northridge
undergraduate