Michael Albert Tomasulo

Michael Albert Tomasulo

also known as Mike Tomasulo

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.7

Licensed for 30 years

Patent infringement Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Intellectual Property

333 South Hope Street, 38th Floor, Los Angeles, CA

About Michael

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 30 years

State: California

Acquired: 1995

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Winston & Strawn, LLP

333 South Hope Street, 38th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90071

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Michael Albert Tomasulo's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Michael Albert Tomasulo's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Michael

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.7 (Superb)

Honors

2014

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2013

IP Star, Managing Intellectual Property

2013

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2012

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2011

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2005

Rising Star,

Education

1994

University of Southern California Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

University of California - Berkeley

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2005

The Healthcare Roundtable

Electronic Discovery - What You Need To Know

2004

University of Southern California Intellectual Property Institute

International Patent Strategy

2004

Meeting of Taiwanese Semiconductor Industry Association

Recent Developments in U.S. Patent Law

2004

American Chemical Society Annual Meeting

Doctrine of Equivalents

2002

PLI Litigation Seminar

Omitted Element Test; Succeeding With an Enablement Defense; Inequitable Conduct

Publications

2005

Corporate Counsel Magazine Rule Changes for Electronic Discovery?

2005

Global Views Monthly Patent Strategy for Taiwanese Companies

2004

The Deal.com Tips for IP Due Diligence in Technology Deals

2004

University of Southern California Intellectual Property Institute Foreign Patent Litigation

2003

Unknown Intellectual Property Due Diligence For VC’s In Technology Fields: What You Need To Know About Your Acquisition And Why

2003

Corporate Counsel's Quarterly Leave No Stone Unturned: The 'Reasonable Inquiry' Requirements of Rule 11 in Patent Cases

2002

Patent Law Institute The Rise and Fall of the 'Omitted Element Test'

2002

Patent Law Institute Less is More: Succeeding With An Enablement Defense

2002

Patent Law Institute A Duty To Disclose By Any Other Name: The Moral Behind The Nebulous Inequitable Conduct Standard

2001

Patent Law Institute The 'Reasonable Inquiry' Requirements of Rule 11 in Patent Cases

2001

Patent Law Institute New Rule 56, The Evolving Standard of Disclosure and Litigation Sanctions Available for Inequitable Conduct
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution