John David Rowell

John David Rowell

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.5

Licensed for 48 years

Defective and dangerous products Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Defective and Dangerous Products, Personal Injury

1925 Century Park East, Suite 800, Los Angeles, CA

About John

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Defective and Dangerous Products 70%

Representing clients who have been catastrophically injured or whose loved ones have been killed as a result of motor vehicle accidents, train accidents, airplane accidents and defective products. John Rowell has been a pioneer in the field of consumer safety. He has represented clients in cases involving a wide array of products where the product design was unsafe such as airplanes, automobiles and tires.

70%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 48 years

State: California

Acquired: 1977

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Cheong, Denove, Rowell, Bennett & Hapuarachy

1925 Century Park East, Suite 800, Los Angeles, CA, 90067

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John David Rowell's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

John David Rowell's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.5 (Superb)

Honors

2018

Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Southern California Super Lawyer

2015

Super Lawyer, Southern California Super Lawyer

2014

Super Lawyer, Southern California Super Lawyer

2013

Super Lawyer, Southern California Super Lawyer

2012

Super Lawyer, Southern California Super Lawyer

2011

Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2011

Superb Rating 10/10, AVVO

2010

Superb Rating 10/10, AVVO

2010

Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2009

So. California SuperLawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

Associate Award, American Board of Trial Advocates

2008

Appellate Lawyer of the Year nomination, Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles

2008

Certificate of Appreciation, Los Angeles Superior Court

2006

Certificate of Appreciation for Outstanding Contributions, The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California

2005

Certificate of Appreciation for Outstanding Contributions, The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California

Work Experience

2018 - Present

Partner, Cheong, Denove, Rowell, Bennett & Hapuarachy

2014 - Present

Partner, Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett

2012 - 2014

Partner, Cheong, Denove, Rowell, Bennett & Karns

2000 - 2012

Partner, Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett

1997 - 1999

Attorney, Law Offices of John D.Rowell

1992 - 1997

Partner, Rowell & Tessier

1989 - 1992

Attorney, Law Firm Paul & Stuart

Associations

Attorneys Information Exchange Group (AIEG)

Member

American Board of Trial Advocates

Member

California Plaintiffs Committee for the Explorer Firestone Tire

Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles

Member

Consumer Attorneys of California

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Penrod v Pryke

Jury ruled in favor of Penrod.

Khankhanian v Branard Construction

Largest verdict for fibromyalgia $885,036

Grimshaw v Ford

Victim Got $127.8 Million

Paris Air Crash

The US courts granted the largest settlement from

Warren v. Schecter (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 1189

Gross verdict of $14,961,821

Desert Wind Partners v Johnson & Higgins

Jefferson v. County of Kern (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 606

Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 200

General Motors Corp. v. Superior Court (Jeffrey) (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 580

Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Superior Court (Fisher) (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 587

See More Legal Cases

Education

N/A

USC Law School

law

N/A

Univ of Southern Calif

undergraduate

Speaking Engagements

2009

2009 Las Vegas Convention Auto Cases: A to Z

2008

26th Annual Las Vegas Convention Auto Collision Cases

2006

24th Annual Las Vegas Convention Pre-Trial Procedure

2005

23rd Annual Las Vegas Convention

The Industrial & Mechanical Equipment Case

2005

23rd Annual Las Vegas Convention Product Liability

Publications

2010

The Advocate-Journal of Consumers Attorneys Association Safety or Profit: Ford’s Rollover Protection System

2008

The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California The Road Less traveled: Often Ignored Sources of Information About The Accidents And Your Client's Injuries

2006

The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California The Sordid History of Auto Safety Glass

2004

The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California How to Determine If Seatbelts Were in Use.

N/A

The Advocate-Journal of Consumers Attorneys Association What to Do When Served with an Anti-SLAPP Motion to Dismiss

N/A

The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California Choice of Law in Punitive Damage Cases

N/A

The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California Ford Explorer: History Repeats Itself

N/A

The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California The Owner’s Manual, Warranty and Advertising Can and Should Be Used to Support Consumer Expectations Claims

N/A

The Advocate, the Journal of Consumer Attorneys Association for Southern California What of Mine is Yours?

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution