No Photo

Brent Douglas Sokol

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review

Licensed for 32 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property

555 South Flower Street, 50th Floor, Los Angeles, CA

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Brent

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 32 years

State: California

Acquired: 1993

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Jones Day

555 South Flower Street, 50th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90071

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

1840 Century Park E Ste 1900, Los Angeles, CA, 90067-2121

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Brent Douglas Sokol's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

5 star 0
4 star 0
3 star 0
2 star 0
1 star 0

Brent Douglas Sokol's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Brent

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

1993

Boston University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1987

Northwestern University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2007

Annual Meeting

IP Tax Problems and Protection

2006

Unknown

Fox News Broadcast - Pro Bono Recognition for Web Domain Name Dispute

2004

Practising Law Institute Faculty Lecture

Developing a Strategic IP Technology Management Program

2004

Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association at the Industrial Technology Research Institute

Developing a Strategic IP Technology Management Program

2003

National Taiwan University College of Law IP Seminar

Festo: The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals en banc Decision on Remand

2003

Taiwan Electrical and Electronic Manufacturer’s Association and Economic Daily Symposium

Patent Prosecution Strategies for the Taiwanese Company

2003

Taiwan Electrical and Electronic Manufacturer’s Association and Economic Daily Symposium

Patent Prosecution Strategies for the Taiwanese Company

2003

American Corporate Counsel Association

E- Discovery: What You Need to Know and Do Now to Avoid Costly Surprises

2002

University of Arkansas Medical Center

Preserving and Protecting Intellectual Property

Publications

2005

California Lawyer Magazine Intellectual Property Roundtable--Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement after Grokster

2005

Unknown Developing a Strategic IP Technology Management Program, Handling Intellectual Property Issues in Business Transactons

1996

Kyoto Comparative Law Center California Unfair Competition Law
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution