Adjuster in MVA case lied about the law
You have no case. In 1988 the CA supreme court ruled that the other driver's insurance carrier (we call that a 3rd party carrier) owes you no legal...
Los Angeles, CA
Personal injury Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Car Accidents ... +2 more
You have no case. In 1988 the CA supreme court ruled that the other driver's insurance carrier (we call that a 3rd party carrier) owes you no legal...
I would suggest handling this matter in a different manner. if you have homeowner's insurance or renter's insurance, make a claim to your...
If I may add one more suggestion. You have already read the statute is 2 years, and you can send out a demand for arbitration (by certified mail),...
Selected as the best answer
Most attorneys know how to present a claim so it does not look like extortion. You are best off asking this to your own lawyer. Good luck with...
I think the adjuster is correct. The Insurance Code defines an "uninsured motor vehicle" as motor vehicle with respect where there is no bodily...
Under CA law, a client has the right to fire a lawyer and the lawyer is obligated to return to the client the entire original file. Since the case...
You ask a good question. There are seperate issues which are unrelated. The first is the determination of an insurance carrier as to fault. ...
This is an interesting question. I believe Mr. Kopilenko is correct. You either accept or ignore. If you go to trial and beat the $25k CCP 998,...
If you had automobile insurance, contact your carrier and report the loss. Hopefully it is covered under your policy.
This is a very complicated legal area, with many, many cases. Since each case is fact specific, your best bet is to try and do your own legal...
Selected as the best answer