Larry B v DW
May 15, 2008OUTCOME: $250,000 policy limits
Rear-end auto accident in a parking lot. Neck surgery recommended.
S Edmond ElDabe's Legal Cases (17)
Los Angeles, CA
Personal injury Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Wrongful Death
A.A vs B.S.S and D.R
Jul 26, 2007OUTCOME: $90,500
In July, 2007, plaintiff was walking in Corona inside a gated community when she slipped and fell as a result of a hidden and dangerous condition caused by slippery algae in the street gutters. She br ... oker her foot. Mr. El Dabe was able to prove that the HOA had been warned numerous times of the condition, but did nothing about it.
Derek V v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Resort
Jun 07, 2007OUTCOME: $65,000
Client broke leg on Mammoth Mountain while snowboarding. We overcame huge legal hurdles including assumption of risk and signature of waiver and factual hurdles (Plaintiff was snowboarding off the cour ... se) to obtain a recovery.
D.R. v Left turn driver
N/AOUTCOME: $250,000 policy limits
D.R., sleeping in passenger seat of minivan being driven by his girlfriend, driving through an intersection in Long Beach, when another driver negligently turns left in front of D.R. and his girlfriend ... . DR's head hits side glass, shatters glass, loses front teeth. Rushed to hospital from where D.R. has staples inserted into his head. DR will never be the same, and unfortunately, the other driver only had $250,000 in coverage.
R.C. v s CostCo
N/AOUTCOME: $300,000 for slip and fall accident
Plaintiff was shopping at CostCo in Los Alamitos when he slipped and fell in a messy area of the store where a CostCo employee was giving out canned peach samples. The peach slime and oil was all ove ... r the floor, creating a dangerous condition for store patrons, and Plaintiff fell and was seriously injured.
AW vs EC
N/AOUTCOME: $112,500
Auto accident where AW was back seat passenger not wearing seatbelt. Suffered scapula fracture. First offer from Insurance company was $25,000
M.G. v R.R.
N/AOUTCOME: $262,500
Auto v Pedestrian. Policy limit was only $ 100,000. We forced the Defendant to personally contribute $162,500 above the policy.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
