Alexander Chester Giza

Alexander Chester Giza

Judicial

About Alexander

Licenses

Licensed in California for 25 years

State: California

Acquired: 2001

Judicial

No misconduct found


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Experience

Avvo does not rate this lawyer because he or she is in Judicial status.

Honors

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Top 100, Southern California Super Lawyers

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Super Lawyer, Southern California Super Lawyers

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Southern California Super Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2011

Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers

2008

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Partner, Hueston Hennigan LLP

2009 - 2014

Partner, Russ August & Kabat

2001 - 2009

Counsel, Irell & Manella LLP

2000 - 2001

Law Clerk, Justice Walter L. Carpeneti

1999 - 1999

Extern, Judge Arthur L. Alarcón

1998 - 1998

Extern, Judge William J. Rea

1998 - 1999

Teaching Fellow, UCLA School Of Law

1996 - 1997

Field Service Engineer, IAI America

1994 - 1995

Test Engineer, Eaton Corporation

1989 - 1993

Design Engineeer/Manufacturing Supervisor, Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Associations

2015 - Present

USC IP Institute

Planning Committee

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

Federal Circuit Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Clear with Computers v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., No. 6:09-cv-479 LED (E.D. Tex.)

Favorable jury verdict, a damages judgment of $19.5 million, and affirmation on appeal.

TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Communications Corp., No. 2-04-cv-01 DF (E.D. Tex.)

Favorable jury verdict of willful infringement, a damages judgment of $104 million, a permanent injunction, affirmation in relevant part on appeal, supplemental damages award of $103 million, contempt damages award of over $200 million

Digital CBT v. TiVo Inc., Case No. CV12-0618 CJC (C.D. Cal.)

Favorable settlement and low costs

TQP Development v. Newegg, No. 2:11-cv-248 JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.)

Favorable $2.3 million jury verdict.

Knowles Electronics, LLC v. American Audio Components, Inc., No. 06-cv-6213 JFG (N.D. Ill.)

Favorable settlement after 11-day hearing and denial of plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction

Pause Technology LLC v. TiVo Inc., No. 01-cv-11657 PBS (D. Mass.), aff'd, 419 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir.)

Summary judgment of noninfringement and affirmation on appeal.

TiVo v. Echostar (Fed. Cir.) (en banc)

Five former U.S. federal court judges supported the district court's ruling of contempt, which the Federal Circuit en banc affirmed.

Microsoft v. i4i (U.S. Supreme Court)

Six former U.S. PTO and Patent Commissioners advocated for maintaining the clear-and-convincing standard of proof needed to invalidate a U.S. Patent, which the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2000

University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law

JD

1989

University of Virginia

BS

Speaking Engagements

Publications

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution