Recent arbitration cases that I have decided:

N/A

OUTCOME:

➢ Appointed as co-arbitrator in Hong Kong seated arbitral proceedings involving a dispute between Dutch and Chinese parties to a hotel management agreement governed by Chinese law. HKIAC Administered ... Arbitration Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 3,500,000. ➢ Appointed as sole arbitrator in a Hong Kong seated trademark licensing dispute under Hong Kong law between Japanese and Chinese parties. HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 2,500,000. ➢ Appointed as co-arbitrator in a Hong Kong seated dispute between a Singapore claimant and multiple Asian and off-shore respondents alleging breach of a share purchase agreement and related guarantees under New York law. UNCITRAL Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 15,000,000. ➢ Appointed as co-arbitrator in multiple Singapore seated references by a U.S.-based securities broker alleging breach of customer agreements under Connecticut law by multiple Asian respondents. ICDR Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 15,000,000. ➢ Appointed as sole arbitrator in a trademark licensing dispute seated in Hong Kong and governed by Hong Kong law between Dutch and Chinese parties pertaining to the manufacture and distribution of luxury clothing and household furnishing products. ICC Rules. Amount in controversy € 4,500,000. ➢ Appointed as sole arbitrator and as chairman, in related Hong Kong seated proceedings concerning a dispute between Singapore and Chinese parties under a hotel management agreement and a trademark license agreement governed by P.R. China and Hong Kong law, respectively. The arbitration agreement required that the arbitrator be "bilingual in both Chinese and English". HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 3,500,000. ➢ Appointed as co-arbitrator in a dispute seated in Toronto over a trademark licensing and product distribution agreement under New York law for water treatment technologies. ICDR Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 12,000,000. ➢ Appointed as chairman in a dispute seated in Singapore between Australian and Malaysian parties to a software distribution and trademark licensing agreement under Queensland law. The arbitration agreement required that the arbitrator "must have recognised expertise in information technology". SIAC Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 600,000. ➢ Appointed as co-arbitrator in a Hong Kong seated dispute between a UK telecommunications company and a Chinese value added services provider for breach of an acquisition agreement under New York law. ICC Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 110,000,000. ➢ Appointed as co-arbitrator in a Hong Kong seated ad hoc arbitration between U.S. and Chinese parties involving a failed acquisition agreement and telecommunications and IP licensing issues under P.R. China law. UNCITRAL Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 80,000,000. ➢ Appointed as sole arbitrator in a Singapore seated dispute arising under Singapore law between a Singapore Internet services provider and a Singapore hotel management company for the installation of a voice over Internet protocol telecommunications network. SIAC Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 500,000. ➢ Appointed as sole arbitrator under a contract between Singapore parties for the construction and testing of a Point-of-Sale system operating throughout Asia under Singapore law. SIAC Domestic Arbitration Rules. Amount in controversy US$ 150,000.