Colleen E Maring

MY NAME IS CHARLES ANDERSON, I HAD FOUND COLLEEN MARRING THRU INTERNET SEARCH- TO SPECIFICALLY FILE HIS HABEAS CORPUS- BASED ON TRIAL JUDGE INTENTIONAL BIAS- AND FAILURE TO DO A REQUIRED - " SELL TEST " - DURING THE PROCESS OF HAVING HIM FORCE MEDICATED IN THE PIMA COUNTY JAIL- FOR RTC- "RESTORE T...O COMPETENCY"- SPECIFICALLY- SELL V. US. 539, 166, 123 SCT 1274 (2003) SPECIFICALLY SUPREME COURT GOVERNING CASE LAW IN 2007 - WHEN POWELL WAS FIRST PUT INTO THE PIMA COUNTY JAIL RESTORATION TO COMPETENCY PROGRAM. THE RECORD IS DISGUSTING WITH DELIBERATE BIAS, INTENTIONAL PHYSICAL HARM ORDERED BY THE JUDGE ON POWELL IN JAIL. THIS ATTORNEY DELIBERATELY LIED TO VINCENT POWELL-SHE CONVINCED HIM THAT SHE WOULD FILE HIS HABEAS CORPUS AND HAD THE AZDOC- MENTAL HEALTH WARD TRANSFER 70,000$ DOLLARS FROM HIS ACCOUNT INTO HERS AT ASPEY WATKINS & DIESEL- HER FORMER LAW GROUP. AZDOC IS BEING FILED WITH A RECORDS RELEASE OF HIS INMATE BANKING ACCOUNT. COLLEEN DID NOT FILE THE HABEAS CORPUS- BUT INSTEAD- SAID SHE WAS UNQUALIFIED TO GO BEFORE THE 9TH CIR. CT. APPLS. - (IN FACT HANDED THIS CASE OFF TO ANOTHER SHYSTER SUSAN YORKE- AT CALG- (COMPLEX APPELLATE LAW GROUP)- WHOM LIED TO VINCENT POWELL SAYING SHE WOULD THEN EXPOSE THE RECORD- AND TOOK ANOTHER 45,000$ FROM HIS ACCOUNT. - SEE EVIDENCE- UTUBE- ORAL ARGUMENT- TYPE IN SEARCH - POWELL V. SHINN 9TH CIR. CT APPLS. 19-15375- JAMES R. BROWINING U.S. COURTHOUSE COURTROOM 3 . SUSAN YORKE IS THE ATTORNEY THAT COLLEEN HANDED POWELLS CASE OFF TOO- THEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT OUT THE RULING CASE LAW- SELL V. U.S 539 166 (2003)-FURTHER- POWELLS TRIAL RECORD SHOWS THE TRIAL JUDGE CALLED THE PIMA COUNTY JAIL AND ORDERED POWELL BEATEN AND BROUGHT TO TRIAL IN A RESTRAINT CHAIR WITH FACIAL CONTUSIONS-ON HIS DAY OF TRIAL- THEN AFTER BEING DISPLAYED TO THE JURY PANEL - HE HAD HIM HELD NAKED IN THE INFIRMARY- AN TRIED ABSENTIA- POWELL WAS LIED TO BY BOTH OF THESE ATTORNEYS- THEY DELIBERATELY CONSPIRED TO KEEP POWELL IN JAIL BECAUSE HE IS A THIRD STRIKE MENTALLY DISABLED OFFENDER. THIS ATTORNEY TOOK VINCENT POWELLS MONEY , INTENTIONALLY LIED ABOUT HER QUALIFICATIONS TO FILE SUCH AN APPEAL- THEN - " RETIRED -TO BE WHERE SHE IS AT NOW. I HAVE GOTTEN THRU 2 BOXES OF THIS PAPERWORK- AN THERE IS NO WAY ANY JUDICIAL OFFICER SHOULD KEEP WHAT HAPPENED TO HIM FROM COMING OUT. HE WAS INTENTIONALLY POISONED WITH PSYCH DRUGS- BEAT, AND HELD NAKED FOR UP TO 96 HOURS AT A TIME : THE JUDICIAL INTENTIONAL HARM INFLICTED ON POWELL IS EVEN MADE A RECORD KOF BY THE STENOGRAPHER IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. THIS IS FRAUD. I AM GOING TO FOLLOW THE MONEY- AND FILE COMPLAINT TO THE ARIZONA STATE BAR- AS WELL AS FRAUD CHARGES. THE ATTORNEY YOU HANDED THIS CASE OFF TO - SEE SPECIFIC EVIDENCE OF UTUBE- ORAL ARGUMENT ON INTERNET- ATTORNEY LIED TO ALL 3 JUSTICES- THE INTENTIONAL HARM ORDERED BY THE TRIAL JUDGE IS ASTOUNDING IN THE RECORD. SEE PG.5-9 DAY 1 TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS. THE ATTORNEY THEN GAVE THE JUDGE AN IRRELEVANT DISTRICT COURT CASE THATS OVER 65 YRS OLD- AND NOT THE RULING SUPREME COURT CASE- SELL V. US - VINCENT POWELL IS ON THE MENTAL HEALTH WARD IN AZDOC- THE MONEY OFF HIS ACCOUNT ACCUSES YOU OF INTENTIONAL NEGLECT, INTENTIONAL HARM, DISREGARD, LEGAL MALPRACTICE, AND WE WILL BE FILING A LAWSUIT AGAINST YOU AND THE ATTORNEY SUSAN YORKE IN THAT VIDEO- THE JUDGES DIRECTLY ASK HER NUMEROUS TIMES- BY WHAT SUPREME COURT CASE- ( SELL V. U.S 539 166-(2003) DO WE USE TO OFFER POWELL RELIEF ? IN FACT ASKED- "WHERE IN THE RECORD"? - ON 2 DIFFERENT OCCASIONS- POINTING OUT THE CASE LAW GIVEN WAS NOT POWELLS CASE SPECIFIC. BOTH YOU AND SUSAN YORKE -( FROM CALG - SAN FRANSICO CA OFFICE )CONSPIRED TO KEEP THE RECORD FROM COMING OUT-