No Photo

Ross Patrick Schreiter

Licensed for 2 years

Family Lawyer at Scottsdale, AZ
Practice Areas: Family

9000 E Pima Center Pkwy Ste 355, Scottsdale, AZ

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Ross

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 2 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 2023

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Genesis Legal Group

9000 E Pima Center Pkwy Ste 355, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258-4472

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Ross Patrick Schreiter's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by Christopher | December 07, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Alimony

Representation Lacked Urgency and Follow-Through in a Complex Divorce Case

I retained this lawyer from an Illinois firm for a complex Illinois divorce involving significant marital assets, financial irregularities, and safety concerns. My experience with the representation was deeply disappointing, and I believe it is important to share my perspective so others can make inf...ormed decisions. During my time as a client, several issues significantly affected the outcome of my case: Delays in critical filings: Key discovery deadlines passed without action, and my discovery materials were not sent to the opposing party for approximately three months. Lack of timely financial investigation: Despite early documentation of substantial financial discrepancies and missing records, subpoenas and motions that could have protected marital assets were not pursued with urgency. Long periods without communication: I experienced extended gaps—sometimes weeks—without updates, even during pivotal stages of the case. Missed court event: A pre-trial conference was missed, which further contributed to delays. Insufficient use of documentation I provided: I supplied detailed financial analyses and evidence of irregularities, but these materials were not incorporated into motions or court strategy in a way that meaningfully advanced my position. Pushback against inaccurate claims: Opposing counsel made several repeated false income claims, inflating my salary over the years to position her client into a favorable position to receive maintenance. These claims were not refuted with factual evidence provided, but rather allowed to remain and set the narrative with the court. Transition issues: When my attorney left the firm, there was no advance notice, and the handoff of my case was incomplete. My new counsel later noted missing components of my file. As a result of these cumulative issues, my case progressed without the financial clarity or asset protection that were available had timely legal steps been taken. The final settlement was shaped by incomplete discovery and the absence of key financial information, and it has had lasting and devestating consequences for my family and personal financial stability and long-term security. I am sharing this review not to assign motives or make personal attacks, but to describe the service I received and the impact it had on my life. I encourage anyone considering representation in a complex or high-conflict divorce to ask detailed questions about discovery strategy, communication practices, asset-protection procedures, and transition planning within the firm.

See All Client Reviews

Ross Patrick Schreiter's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Ross

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

N/A

John Marshall Law School, Chicago

Languages

German

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution