Sid Leach

Sid Leach

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.5

Licensed for 46 years

Trademark infringement Lawyer at Phoenix, AZ
Practice Areas: Trademark Infringement, Patent Infringement

400 E Van Buren St, Suite 1900, Phoenix, AZ

About Sid

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 26 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 1999

Resigned

No misconduct found

Licensed in Texas for 46 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1979

MCLE Non-Practicing

No misconduct found

Location

Snell & Wilmer, L.P.

400 E Van Buren St, Suite 1900, Phoenix, AZ, 85004-2202

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Sid Leach's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Sid Leach's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Sid

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.5 (Superb)

Honors

2011

The Best Lawyers in America®, Intellectual Property Law, Best Lawyers in America

2010

The Best Lawyers in America®, Intellectual Property Law, Best Lawyers in America

2010

Super Lawyers - Corporate Counsel Edition, Law & Politics Magazine

2010

Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America

2009

The Best Lawyers in America®, Intellectual Property Law, Best Lawyers in America

2009

Southwest Super Lawyers, Law & Politics Magazine

2009

Top Ten Jury Verdict in Arizona, State Bar of Arizona

2008

The Best Lawyers in America®, Intellectual Property Law, Best Lawyers in America

2007

The Best Lawyers in America®, Intellectual Property Law, Best Lawyers in America

2007

Southwest Super Lawyers, Law & Politics Magazine

Sample of Legal Cases

Skydive Arizona, Inc. vs. Quattrocchi, et al.

Jury verdict of $6,600,004 in favor of client; later increased by the court to $10,100,004

See More Legal Cases

Education

1978

University of Virginia

J.D.

1975

University of Alabama

B.S.

Speaking Engagements

2010

AIPLA Mid-Winter Meeting

What Corporate Counsel Needs to Know About Computer Forensic Evidence in Trade Secret Cases

2008

Ninth Annual Intellectual Property Law Symposium

Ethical Rules Governing Pre-Filing Investigations in Patent Cases and the Consequences of Failing to Perform an Adequate Investigation

2008

AIPLA Mid-Winter Meeting

Common Ethical Issues in Enforcing, Licensing and Managing Your IP

2008

21st Annual Intellectual Property Law Course

Pre-Filing Investigations

2007

Sixth Annual Hot Topics in Patent Law Symposium

Ethical Requirements of Pre-Filing Investigations in Patent Suits

2007

Patent Litigation Seminar

The Consequences of Falling to Perform an Adequate Pre-filing Investigation Before Filing a Patent Infringement Action

2007

Arizona State Bar Convention

Rule 11 Requirements for Patent Litigation Pre-Filing Investigations

2007

AIPLA Spring Meeting

Patent Trolls Beware: Ethics and Consequences in Filing Patent Suits Without a Sufficient Pre-Filing Investigation

2007

Advanced Patent Litigation Seminar

Consequences When a Patent Troll Files a Patent Suit Without a Sufficient Pre-Filing Investigation

2006

Construction Law Section Meeting

Architectural Copyrights

2002

Lorman Seminar

Trademark Litigation

2002

IP Practitioner's Seminar

Patent Litigation Trends and Developments

Publications

2010

11th Annual Intellectual Property Law Symposium, University of Texas Law School What Every Lawyer Needs to Know About Computer Forensic Evidence

2008

IP Litigator Malicious Prosecution Claims Can Provide an Effective Remedy Against Patent Litigation Extortion Schemes

2007

American Lawyer Ammunition for Defendants

2007

The Licensing Journal Malicious Prosecution Claims Can Provide an Effective Remedy Against Patent Litigation Extortion Schemes

2007

Los Angeles Daily Journal Troll Control

2005

Arizona Association of Defense Counsel Defending Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims - The Identification of Trade Secrets
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution