Doyle v. Doyle, 2011 UT 42

Jul 22, 2011

OUTCOME: Affirmed against client.

J.C. v. State of Utah, 2011 UT App 215

Jun 30, 2011

OUTCOME: Affirmed against client.

Dahl v. Harrison, 2011 UT App 389

Jan 01, 2011

OUTCOME: Affirmed against client

Case addressed the question of what notice is required to a client for attorney to settle a parent time issue.

Dahl v. James R. Taylor, No. 20100262-CA, Utah Court of Appeals

Apr 29, 2010

OUTCOME: Reversed in part and remanded for client.

Trial court ordered to hold an evidentiary hearing about child's best interest when child placed in lock down facility with no access to the other parent

Doyle v. Doyle, 2009 UT App 306

Oct 29, 2009

OUTCOME: Affirmed against client.

Dahl v. The Fourth District Court of the State of Utah et al.., No. 20080897-CA, Utah Court of Appeals

Dec 01, 2008

OUTCOME: Affirmed against client.

Forex Liquidity v. Critchfield, No. 2:2007cv00416, Utah District Court

Jun 22, 2007

OUTCOME: Affirmed against client.

Tschaggeny v. Milbank Ins. Company, 2007 UT 37

Apr 27, 2007

OUTCOME: Affirmed against client.

Madsen v. Madsen, 2006 UT App 267

Jun 09, 2006

OUTCOME: Reversed in part and remanded for client.

Wardle v. Bowen, 2005 UT App 226

May 19, 2005

OUTCOME: Client substantially prevailed on appeal.

The court affirmed attorneys fee award below and awarded attorneys fees on appeal except on the issue of calculation of father's income for child support. Court affirmed that medical and daycare expens ... es were in the nature of support and did not need to be determined by the Bankruptcy Court.