Stolow v. Greg Manning Auctions, Inc

Nov 17, 2003

OUTCOME: https://casetext.com/case/stolow-v-greg-manning-auctions-inc

https://casetext.com/case/stolow-v-greg-manning-auctions-inc

Katz v. I.A. Alliance Corp.

Oct 21, 2003

OUTCOME: The Court of Appeals affirmed the decisions granting the I. Appel’s motion to reopen its bankruptcy case.

Loussier v. Universal Music Group

Oct 20, 2003

OUTCOME: Motion for reconsideration denied

A motion by plaintiff Jacques Loussier ("Loussier") to reconsider this Court's Opinion and Order, dated April 10, 2003, denying his motion to compel discovery of any complaints and cease and desist let ... ters and the disposition of those claims against Dr. Dre for copyright infringement

About.com, Inc. v. Targetfirst, Inc

Mar 07, 2003

OUTCOME: See summary: https://casetext.com/case/aboutcom-inc-v-targetfirst-inc

Plaintifff sued suit for breach of contract, libel, and product disparagement. Defendant counterclaimed for breach & fraud based on the same underlying facts.

Jones v. FCC

Sep 04, 2002

OUTCOME: https://tjcenter.org/litigation/jones-v-f-c-c/

https://tjcenter.org/litigation/jones-v-f-c-c/

Vincini v. Am. Bldg. Maint. Co.

Jul 19, 2002

OUTCOME: Finding it was harmless error for district court to instruct jury as to burden-shifting framework.

Katz v. Feinberg

May 13, 2002

OUTCOME: As the parties' agreement isolated valuation from arbitration, the district court properly ordered the attempt to arbitrate valuation invalid

Norman Katz appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Charles S. Haight, Judge ) vacating, pursuant to Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act ( ... “FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1, et al, a finding in his favor made by an arbitration panel against his former business partner Herbert Feinberg.

Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, Docket

Jan 29, 2002

OUTCOME: The Appellants no basis for disturbing the District Court's judgment. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

This appeal concerns the anti-trafficking provisions of the DMCA, which Congress enacted in 1998 to strengthen copyright protection in the digital age.

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enter

Jan 28, 2002

OUTCOME: A trademark licensee can sue its licensor for false advertising of the licensor's product, but the District Court did not err in denying the preliminary injunction.

This appeal, raising issues concerning the rights of a trademark licensee, arises from a dispute between the motion picture studio that produced the film “X-Men” and the studio's licensor, which has pu ... blished “X-Men” comic books and currently produces the television series, “Mutant X.” Plaintiff-Appellant Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. (“Fox”) appeals from the Opinion and Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen G. Schwartz, District Judge), entered August 13, 2001, denying a motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the Defendants-Appellees Marvel Enterprises, Inc. (“Marvel”), Tribune Entertainment Co. (“Tribune”), and Fireworks Communications, Inc. and Fireworks Television (US), Inc. (collectively, “Fireworks”) from airing the “Mutant X” television series, at least in its current form.   The injunction was sought on the grounds that the TV series violated Fox's contractual rights and its rights under the Lanham Act. The ruling also dismissed Fox's Lanham Act claims.

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enters

Jan 14, 2002

OUTCOME: A trademark licensee can sue its licensor for false advertising of the licensor's product, but also that the District Court did not err in denying a preliminary injunction