Free Consultation
$0 first 60 minutes
4
Practice Areas
Free Consultation
$0 first 60 minutes
$ 350-400 per hour
32%-40%
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: New Mexico
Acquired: 2016
No misconduct found
State: California
Acquired: 2003
No misconduct found
State: Colorado
Acquired: 2001
No misconduct found
4750 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO, 80305
Not Yet Reviewed
"I endorse this lawyer. I worked with Jesse on appeals in civil cases. He had made a strong trial court record, a critical foundation for any appeal. Jesse was easy to work with, pragmatic and focused on accomplishing results for our clients."
Appeals lawyer
Estate planning lawyer
2020
Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers
2015
Author of the Year, Community Associations Institute
2013
Rising Star, Super Lawyers Magazine
1998
Moot court, best oralist, Hastings College of the Law
2018 - Present
Of Counsel, Frascona, Joiner, Goodman & Greenstein, PC
2015 - 2015
General Counsel, Hamon Infrastructure
2008 - 2018
Attorney, The Witt Law Firm
2003 - 2008
Partner, Benson & Associates, PC
2000 - 2003
Attorney, Burdman & Benson/Burdman Law Group
1999 - 2000
Law Clerk, Denver District Court
2009 - Present
Associazione Internazionale di Giuristi Lingua Italiana
2009 - Present
Colorado Bar Association, Appellate Practice Subcommittee
2008 - Present
Community Associations Institute
2002 - Present
Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, Amicus Committee
2002 - Present
American Bar Association, Forum on the Construction Industry
Jury returned verdict in favor of contractor on all claims and awarded $769,000 in damages, including $150,000 in lost profits, and court later added $900,000 in attorney fees.
The appellate court reversed, holding that contractor had never accepted the defendant's offer. Following remand, jury awarded contractor $769,000 in damages and court added $900,000 in attorney fees.
The court dismissed the majority of the plaintiff's claims. The parties reached a confidential settlement of the remaining issues.
The appellate court affirmed the dimissal orders but reversed the majority of the attorney fees awards.
The parties reached a confidential settlement.
The appellate court reversed the judgment and remanded with instructions to allow contractor's claims to proceed to trial.
The appellate court reversed the verdict and remanded for a new trial.
The court granted the homeowners association's motion to dismiss or stay federal suit pending resolution of state court garnishment action. The parties later settled.
The appellate court affirmed a verdict in favor of the association, which later settled with the builders' insurance carriers for approximately $6.5 million.
2001
J.D.
1996
A.B.
2012
Ethics of representing HOA's and multiple parties in construction defect litigation
2004
Practical Tips for the Electronic Office
2013
2012
2006
2005
Italian
English