Katherine G Gerland

Katherine G Gerland

also known as Kate Gerland

4.0
Rating: 7.3

Licensed for 31 years

Education Lawyer at Louisville, CO
Practice Areas: Education

357 S. McCaslin Blvd. Suite 200, Louisville, CO

About Katherine

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Education 100%

19 years

100%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Colorado for 31 years

State: Colorado

Acquired: 1994

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Education Law Offices LLC

357 S. McCaslin Blvd. Suite 200, Louisville, CO, 80027

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Katherine G Gerland's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 1
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | March 26, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Education

Not recommended

Without being too specific, this attorney may be a nice person but they do not understand the difference between and IEP and the legal rights children and parents have under an IEP which districts do NOT want to put children on, and a 504 which she said were were basically equal , is legally and fa...ctually false. 504s do NOT have the legal teeth or length of time they are enforceable like an IEP. After 18 months, she was never able to get appropriate services for our child and her phrase to most people seems to be, " Be nice as pie" which speaks for itself. Her ability to actually get services ( despite the one court case she won which actually HARMED the rest of the SPED children due to its precedent in CO from that point on, is something that most people who we have spoke to in CO, is not a good bet. If you want someone who understands the real truth of fighting for proper qualification for a legally binding ( year long) IEP, as well as why classifications ( OHI versus SLD vs ED etc) is VERY important ( especially for future services) despite the comments of the other reviewer, please seek out attorneys like Michael Breeskin who is one of THE top attorneys in Co https://www.advocacydenver.org/about-us/staff/. Had I known about him back then Id have hired him instead. Our family managed to get some of the things we needed AFTER we severed ties with Kate. She's a lovely woman but IMHO not up to the job.

Posted by Sarah | July 11, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Education

Premier Special Education Attorney

We initially hired Kate to consult with a special ed attorney from another law firm we had hired for our son. Kate had experience with JeffCo school district, while our first attorney did not. Over the course of several months, we realized that our first attorney was a bad 'fit' for us and our situ...ation. We released the first attorney and hired Kate to represent our son. Kate was a Godsend! She effortlessly worked with our outside experts and us--we are lawyers but not in the special ed realm. Kate was very patient in explaining the differences between how the law is written and how it actually works in the real world. (Note: for parents of special ed kids, while IDEA and 504 can seem clear and have strict standards, the actual implementation of those rights is weighted in favor of the school district.) Kate knew how JeffCo and its attorneys work--attempting to provoke parents' anger (so they make mistakes or seem unreasonable), blame the kid (either faking or not as severe), limit options, or limit settlements. Kate made sure that we appeared calm and logical-even though we were raging on the inside. Kate also made sure we stayed in the position where a Court would view our behavior as helpful and within the standards IDEA requires. That included allowing the district to conduct an 'evaluation' at our son's out-of-state residential placement. With Kate by our side, we went through the 'stages' from 'evaluation', to eligibility, to IEP, to due process complaint, to settlement. In terms of an IEP, Kate helped us understand the disability category mattered less than IEP services/goals. While our son is autistic and schizophrenic, the district offered an IEP based on other health impaired category & did not find him eligible under the autism or serious emotional disturbance categories. While it made no sense to us & we wanted to hold out for the proper categories, Kate astutely pointed out that it isn't how you get there (category) but what you get when you are there (services). IEP goals, services, and objectives are confusing if you are not in the special ed realm. Kate was able to take our experts' conclusions (what our son needed to get an education) and turn those into IEP-specific standards tailored for our son. The settlement process was difficult and, again, Kate was invaluable. While it seemed to us (as lawyers and parents) that we had an open and shut case-Kate walked us through all the arguments the school would make and how they could win on those arguments. Again, IDEA and 504 are weighted in favor of the school district. We realized we would never be made whole financially or emotionally. BUT, as Kate pointed out, we could get something back AND get our son an education AND avoid an overly stressful, emotional, long-term legal battle. Kate is a phenomenal special education attorney who focuses on the family unit and what is best for them. Sometimes that means you will have to settle with the school district but it does provide you the emotional wherewithal to focus on your disabled child (and non-disabled siblings who get put on the back burner during this process). Kate is a true expert in this field and you should be confident in her ability to handle even the most complex cases. Unlike other attorneys, she does not need to be micro-managed and can be a trusted adviser and advocate. As a lawyer, I fully recommend Kate for your special ed needs. She is reasonably priced and will work for and seek the best for your family. Her vast experience will work in your favor and help you get the best outcome available for your situation. **As a non-practicing attorney, this review is not being traded for client referrals. Rather, it purely based on our 21 month experience.**

See All Client Reviews

Katherine G Gerland's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Katherine
Elena Jill Eisenberg headshot
Elena Eisenberg

Education lawyer | Jul 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Ms Gerland's compassion and intelligence make her uniquely qualified to advocate for students."

View All Endorsements
Elena Jill Eisenberg headshot
Elena Eisenberg

Education lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.3 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2006 - 2017

Staff Attorney, Law Offices of Louise Bouzari, LLC

Associations

2007 - Present

Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates

Member

Education

1994

University of Colorado Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

Stanford University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution