The State of Texas v. Anthony A. Pradia
N/AOUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State alleged my client parked his cab in an area that was not designated a cab stand. We fought the case in a jury trial, and the jury found my client not guilty.
Austin, TX
Car accident Lawyer at Austin, TX
Practice Areas: Car Accidents, Personal Injury ... +3 more
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State alleged my client parked his cab in an area that was not designated a cab stand. We fought the case in a jury trial, and the jury found my client not guilty.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State accused my client of speeding 75 mph in a 60 mph zone. We took the case to trial, and the jury found my client not guilty.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State accused my client of selling a car without an auto salesman license. We fought the case in a jury trial. I argued that my client wasn't required to have an auto salesman license to sell his ... granddaughter's vehicle. The jury agreed with me and acquitted my client.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State charged my client with running a stop sign. We fought the case in a jury trial, and the jury found my client not guilty.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State accused my client of speeding and changing lanes unsafely. We took the changing lanes case to trial in front of a jury. The jury found my client not guilty. The State later dismissed the s ... peeding case.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State accused my client of speeding 75 mph in a 65 mph zone. We took the case to trial and the jury found my client not guilty.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State alleged that my client was speeding 61 mph in a 45 mph zone. I argued my client was not traveling that fast, and the speed at which he was traveling was a reasonable and prudent speed under ... the circumstances. The jury agreed and acquitted my client.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty (twice)
The State accused my client of violating numerous provisions of the Houston City Code, all relating to operating a taxi cab. We contested all of the charges. During two separate jury trials, I argued ... that my client was not operating a cab and was falsely accused. The juries in both trials agreed, and found my client not guilty. The State later dismissed the remaining charges.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State accused my client of failing to present a valid instrument for hire. We fought the case in jury trial, and the jury found my client not guilty.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The State accused my client of speeding 30 mph in a 20 mph school zone. We fought the case in a jury trial. At the end of the State's case-in-chief, I made a Motion for Directed Verdict, arguing that ... there was insufficient evidence and my client should be found not guilty as a matter of law. The Court granted my motion and my client was exonerated.