James W Pravel

James W Pravel

5.0
Rating: 9.1

Licensed for 33 years

Patent application Lawyer at Austin, TX
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Trademark Application, Trademark Infringement, Patent Infringement

2028 East Ben White Blvd., Suite 240-8000, Austin, TX

About James

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Patent Application 60%

35 years | 120 cases

60%
Trademark Application 25%

35 years | 40 cases

25%
Trademark Infringement 10%

34 years | 15 cases

10%
Patent Infringement 5%

33 years | 6 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 19 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2007

Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 32 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1993

Administratively Suspended - Non-Payment of Dues

No misconduct found

Licensed in Virginia for 33 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 1992

Associate

No misconduct found

Location

Intella IP

2028 East Ben White Blvd., Suite 240-8000, Austin, TX, 78741

Intella IP

1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA, 22314

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

James W Pravel's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 2
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Communication Style

Posted by Maritza | April 09, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Intellectual Property

Outstanding Attorney

Mr. Pravel has worked diligently to make sure the matter at hand is taken care of professionally and in an expeditious manner. He has made sure along the way to keep me informed and has made sure I completely understand the process and what is going on. I would recommend him to anybody who is dealing... with trademark issues.

See All Client Reviews

James W Pravel's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse James
Darren James Quinn headshot
Darren Quinn

Trademark infringement lawyer | Jun 01

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Pravel was local co-counsel on complex trademark infringement litigations concerning novel and complex issues Internet domain name trademark infringement and in rem jurisdiction of domain names. While one of the complex cases was pending, the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act was passed providing for in rem jurisdiction. He should be your first call if you need an IP attorney in the Washington DC and Virginia areas."

View All Endorsements
Thomas M Dunlap headshot
Thomas Dunlap

Patent infringement lawyer

Lester Lee Hewitt headshot
Lester Hewitt

Patent infringement lawyer

Rouget Frederic Henschel headshot
Rouget Henschel

Patent infringement lawyer

Darren James Quinn headshot
Darren Quinn

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.1 (Superb)

Honors

2015

AV+ Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Top Rated Lawyer, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Top Rated Lawyer, Legal Leaders - ALM Publications

2012

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

AV+ Rating by Peer Review, Martindale Hubbell

2010

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2006

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2005

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2004

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2003

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2002

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2001

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

2000

AV+, Martindale-Hubbell

1999

AV+ Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1991 - 2004

Associate, Mason, Mason & Albright

1980 - 1987

Design/Project Engineer, FMC Wellhead Equipment Division

1978 - 1980

Computer Programmer, The Applied Research Laboratory

Associations

1992 - Present

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Rescue Phone, Inc. v. Enforcement Technology Group, Inc. et al.,

Cased was dismissed with prejudice against Defendant prior to hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment.

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., a corporation vs. LUCENTSUCKS.COM, a domain name,

Case was dismissed.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1991

California Western School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1989

Franklin Pierce Law Center

Pilot IP Law

1980

The University of Texas at Austin

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2001

California Western Class Reunion

Benefits of Legal Education

1998

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Trademark Relations with the US Patent and Trademark Office

Publications

2010

FAQ about Patents FAQ about Patents

2010

FAQ About Trademarks FAQ About Trademarks

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution