Susan Reid Yorke

VINCENT ALPHONSO POWELL #093198 CURRENTLY HOUSED IN THE MENTAL HEALTH WARD IN ASPC-RINCON. HE IS A MENTALLY DISABLED ADULT DIAGNOSED S.M.I. THAT WAS FORCE MEDICATED BY COURT ORDER- NO MANDATORY "SELL TEST" WAS DONE, AND HE WAS FORCED MEDICATED 2 1/2 YRS IN JAIL-THEN JUDGE -( WHOM WAS HIS PREVIOUS... JUDGE 8 YRS EARLIER, THEN 5 YRS BEFORE THAT. IN TOTAL JUDGED HIM FOR ALL THREE STRIKES COMMITTING ARMED ROBBERY WHILE ON DRUGS.-FOUND HIM GUILTY IN ABSENTIA - HELD ON SUICIDE WATCH NAKED DURING THE TRIAL. GIVEN A DOUBLE LIFE CONSECUTIVE SENTENCE -) VINCENT HIRED SUSAN YORKE - FOR 45,000$ TO SPECIFICALLY MAKE THE COURT AWARE HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED-SPECIFICALLY BY FORCE MEDICATING HIM WITH NO OVERSIGHT WHICH LED TO THE PHYSICAL TOXIC POISONING HE RECEIVED BY THE OVER PRESCRIPTION OF THESE PSYCHE MEDS. (SEE SELL V. U.S 539,166(2003)THE ATTORNEY TOOK ADVANTAGE OF VINCENT SAYING SHE WOULD EXPOSE THE RECORD AND DID NOT EVEN READ THE RECORD. AS EVIDENCE I ASK THE PUBLIC TO WATCH THE NOW INFAMOUS U-TUBE VIDEO OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT- GOTO UTUBE- AND TYPE IN POWELL V. SHINN 9TH CIR.CT.APPLS.-19-15375 SUSAN YORKE WAS HIRED TO EXPOSE THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF INCOMPETENCE AND RACIAL BIAS ,PREJUDICIAL BIAS OF THE TRIAL JUDGE-AS WELL AS INTENTIONAL HARM ORDERED TO BEAT POWELL ON DAY OF THE TRIAL TO JAIL STAFF & TRANSPORTED TO COURT AND DISPLAYED IN FRONT OF THE JURY BOUND TO A ROLLING RESTRAINT CHAIR OVER MEDICATED AND MUMBLING INCOHERENTLY THE EXACT SAME THING HIS JUDGE AND DEFENSE COUNCIL TOLD HIM. LIKE THE WERE PRIMING HIM AND COACHING HIM, GROOMING HIM TO PARROT THE JUDGES WORDS- "NO"-THIS JUDGE -( WHOM HAD SENTENCED HIM 2 PREVIOUS TIMES) -FAILED TO SUBMIT A "G.E.I REPORT" BY DR.BARRY MORENZ CONCLUDING HE WAS GUILTY EXCEPT INSANE DURING THE COMMISSION OF THE CRIMES DUE TO THE LEVEL OF DRUGS AND ALCOHOL IN HIS SYSTEM AT THE TIME. ON TOP OF HIM SUFFERING FROM A SEVER MENTAL ILLNESS. THE ATTORNEY WAS ASKED BY ALL THREE JUSTICES IN THE APPEAL- "BY WHAT SUPREME COURT CASE DO WE USE TO DETERMINE POWELL" THE CORRECT ANSWER IS - SELL V. U.S. 539,166(2003) THIS ATTORNEY KNEW THE ANSWER AND INTENTIONALLY LEFT IT OUT. THE COURT COULD CLEARY SEE THE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE IN THE WHOLE RECORD. THE COURT ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS TRIED TO STEER SUSAN YORKE TO THE CORRECT SUPREME COURT CASE- INSTEAD SHE CITED DROPE- & PATE- WHICH IN FACT AZ- USED TO CONVICT HIM ! WATCH THE VIDEO CLOSELY WHEN THE STATE OF ARIZONA STARTS TALKING AND SAYS IT RELIES ON PATE & DROPE- SUSAN CLEARLY IS CAUGHT OFF GUARD- OR TOLD IN ADVANCE DUE TO THE PREJUDICIAL BIAS IN THE TRIAL RECORD- NOT TO BRING UP THE RULING CASE- SELL V. U.S- TO AUTOMATICALLY REMAND POWELL. THIS ATTORNEY LIED TO A DISABLED ADULT ON THE MENTAL HEALTH WARD- TELLING HIM SHE WAS GOING TO EXPOSE THE RECORD- INSTEAD SHE MALICIOUSLY CHANGED THE NARRATIVE OF HIS APPEAL- ARGUING INSTEAD FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA. WATCH THE UTUBE VIDEO ! POWELL V. SHINN 9TH CIR CT APPLS 19-15375 THE WHOLE FACT THAT POWELL WAS FORCE MEDICATED FOR TWO AND A HALF YEARS WAS COMPLETELY WASHED OVER IN HIS APPEAL- THE LAWYER ARGUES FOR A CIRCUIT COURT CASE THAT IS IRRELEVANT ! THE TRIAL COURT JUDGES ABUSE OF POWER, AND DELIBERATE WITH HOLDING OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IS MALICIOUS. THE MENTAL HEALTH COURT JUDGE STATES ON THE RECORD-" A DISSOCIATIVE PERSONALITY DISORDER IS NOT A REAL MENTAL DISEASE " ! IT IS ! GOOGLE THE MAYO CLINIC DEFINITION! THIS JUDGE THEN HAD THE SAME FLAWED ERROR IN JUDGMENT IN ALL CASES FOLLOWING POWELL. THIS ATTORNEY TOOK ADVANTAGE OF VINCENT IN THE MENTAL HEALTH WARD. I AM FILING A COMPLAINT WITH THE CA. STAR BAR, AND LAWSUIT FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE. THIS ATTORNEY TOLD 3 PEOPLE PRIOR TO THE HEARING-POWELL GOT "REPUBLICAN" JUDGES AND WOULD PROBABLY RULE AGAINST US. IN FACT SHE LIED AND OMITED EVIDENCE.