No Photo

Richard Laird

Licensed for 33 years

Banking Lawyer at Austin, TX
Practice Areas: Banking, Intellectual Property, Consumer Protection ... +9 more

1108 Lavaca St Ste 110 Pmb 135, Austin, TX

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023
See Details
Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Richard

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 33 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1992

Not Eligible to Practice - Discipline

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2023

Location

The Laird Law Firm

1108 Lavaca St Ste 110 Pmb 135, Austin, TX, 78701-2110

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Richard Laird's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.5 /5.0

8 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (8) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Responsiveness

Posted by anonymous | August 03, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Complaining to the State Bar

With egg on my face, I'm writing to warn people like me who know better than to hire an attorney with terrible reviews but did so anyway because it's so difficult to find anyone willing to take on small claims court cases. I had planned to represent myself (as plaintiff) but changed course after the ...defendant got away with defying a court order to attempt mediation. Within just a couple of weeks Mr. Laird was already off on the wrong foot, his responsiveness slipping as pledged discovery documents kept slipping further down his calendar -- then he stopped sharing his calendar altogether. By the end of his first monthly-fee billing cycle, he had produced only an appearance of service. I doubt he would have sent anything had it not been time to send the next month's invoice along with it. Indeed the trial had been postponed indefinitely, because of COVID, from later that second month, but I couldn't understand why discovery was slipping farther behind and made it clear I would not want a continuance once the trial was reset. I soon received drafts of two of the four proposed discovery documents, but then Mr. Laird fell silent, ignoring emails and texts I sent when the other two documents went MIA. I didn't hear from him for 2-1/2 months ... when the court sent him notice the trial was reset for 16 days away! I honestly thought he must have become a COVID victim! Mr. Laird claimed there was no way he'd be ready for trial, which incensed me because I made patently clear I wanted to avoid any further delays (the hearing on the mediation order was more than 7 months prior, and this was little old JP court), and we'd had an extra 3 months to prepare! I asked him whatever happened to the other discovery documents, and whether the defendant had ever responded. He seemed confused over my claim I'd never received the drafts or responses to my communication, and final copies (dated late April) he subsequently forwarded contained errors. He told me defendant had never responded to any discovery (allegedly sent certified mail) and admitted he attempted no other means of delivery or to compel response or even inform me. Wondering whether the docs were returned to sender without signature (and if so whether there was still opportunity to courier), I asked repeatedly for date/documentation of delivery but was ignored. The motion for sanctions (on the defied mediation order) Mr. Laird proposed was never filed, nor was I ever afforded an explanation. I waited a few more days for the proof of delivery, then emailed Mr. Laird that I had lost confidence he could adequately represent me. It was meant as a firing, and I didn't pay that month's invoice, nor did Mr. Laird ever respond or reach out to me ahead of trial. But lo and behold he shows up at trial, unprepared! Found it interesting he didn't bring up defendant's nonresponse to discovery at all, which raises my suspicions. Worst of all he didn't direct any rebuttal from me, which preserved defendant's perjured testimony as truth, and he essentially melted down on questioning me. I had prepared a detailed statement of my case, as unrepresented defendant was allowed to give, but never got to read it because Mr. Johnny Come Lately showed up and effectually torpedoed my claim. I plain flat was not kept properly informed nor did I receive adequate counsel, and my case died of neglect. He tried to explain away his lack of due diligence and responsiveness as a product of the pandemic ("I can't help COVID" -- reeallly?), but I was aware from his reviews that this behavior evidently predates it. I feel compelled to file a complaint with the State Bar.

Posted by anonymous | November 25, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Very Good

Mr. Laird is a very good lawyer and follows-up ASAP. Although he is very busy which most good lawyers are, he takes the time to go over your case. If he doesn't answer his phone leave a voice message or email. He will call you as soon as he can which I like. He thoroughly explains things that most cl...ients do not understand such as terminology, steps in case, etc. Very good personality as well. Highly recommended.

See All Client Reviews

Richard Laird's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Richard

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023.

Resignation in Lieu of Discipline issued in TX, 2023

updated on 06/28/2023

This means the attorney resigned in order to avoid being disbarred. "Disbarment" is the most serious penalty for a lawyer.

Education

1991

University of Texas School of Law

Doctor of Jurisprudence/Juris Doctor (J.D.)

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution