Seattle, WA
Construction and development Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Construction & Development, Commercial
OUTCOME:
At issue was whether Washington’s Subcontractor Listing Statute, RCW 39.30.060, as then constituted, provided an implied private cause of action in favor of a listed subcontractor when the general cont ... ractor failed to utilize the subcontractor.
OUTCOME: Win
Representation of the successful general contractor in both the trial court and Court of Appeals in connection with the bid protest and related litigation regarding the $115 million plus King County Re ... gional Justice Center in Kent.
OUTCOME: This was a win for the Associated General Contractors of Washington, our client.
Successful representation of the AGC of Washington in defining the limits by which King County could perform work with its own forces. The AGC prevailed before the Washington State Supreme Court.
OUTCOME: Trial court affirmed. Unfortunately, this result has impacted the claim rights of contractors.
Counsel for the AGC, NECA, SMACNA, and UCA as amicus curiae in support of Mike M. Johnson, Inc., the contractor claimant, against Spokane County in proceedings before the Washington State Supreme Court ... . Participated in oral argument.
OUTCOME: Trial court reversed. This was a win for the contractor, whose side we were representing.
Counsel for the AGC, NECA, SMACNA, and UCA as amicus curiae in support of Weber Construction, Inc. against Spokane County in proceedings before the Washington State Supreme Court. Participated in oral ... argument. At issue was the impact of the contractor’s failure to include an estimate of its damages in its supplemental protest information.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
