Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp. et al., 814 F. Supp. 2d 665 (N.D. Tex. 2011)
Aug 26, 2011OUTCOME: After 7-0 jury verdict, district court entered $4.6M+ judgment against defendant ULT. Judgment affirmed by Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (790 F.3d 1329) after victory at U.S. Supreme Court (135 S. Ct. 1173). Judgment paid in full on 03.25.16.
Successfully represented plaintiff Lighting Ballast in patent infringement suit against multiple manufacturers of electronic lighting ballasts, including GE, Philips, and Universal Lighting Technologie ... s (ULT is a Panasonic subsidiary ). Served as trial counsel and examined key witnesses; was active in appeals at all levels.
