Admire v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 494 Mich 10 (2013)
May 23, 2013OUTCOME: Payment not required
The issue was whether no-fault insurance was legally required to pay the base price of a handicap van
George T. Sinas's Legal Cases (11)
Lansing, MI
Car accident Lawyer at Lansing, MI
Practice Areas: Car Accidents, Personal Injury
Brownell v Brown, 407 Mich 128 (1979)
N/AOUTCOME: Separation not required as long as both impacts were injurious
The issue in this case was whether injuries sustained in two successive impacts require separation between the two impacts.
Hathcox v Liberty Mut Ins Co, 90 Mich App 511 (1979)
N/AOUTCOME: Benefits recoverable
The issue was whether PIP benefits are recoverable for a loading dock injury.
Miller v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 411 Mich 633 (1981)
N/AOUTCOME: Coverage was extended
The issue was whether no-fault PIP benefits are payable in maintenance injuries without regard to the parked status of the vehicle
Vanguard v Clark, 438 Mich 463 (1991)
N/AOUTCOME: Exclusion enforced
The issue was whether an auto exclusion in a homeowners policy bars coverage for carbon monoxide poisoning in home garage.
Clevenger v Allstate Ins Co, 443 Mich 646 (1993)
N/AOUTCOME: Coverage was applicable
The issue was whether auto liability coverage purchased by a vehicle registrant applies to the negligence of the separate owner.
Kreiner v Fischer, 471 Mich 109 (2004)
N/AOUTCOME: Threshold was defined narrowly
The Court had to determine the appropriate meaning of the tort threshold definition of serious impairment of body function.
Jarrad v Integron National Ins Co, 472 Mich 207 (2005)
N/AOUTCOME: Deduction permitted
The issue was whether wage continuation benefits payable under a collective bargaining agreement can be deducted by a no-fault insurer under a coordinated no-fault policy.
Arnold v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 84 Mich App 75 (1978)
N/AOUTCOME: Benefits recoverable
The issue was whether PIP benefits were recoverable for a loading dock injury.
Perkins v Riverside Ins Co, 141 MIch App 379 (1985)
N/AOUTCOME: Setoff not permitted
The issue was whether retirement pension benefits payable to a state trooper can be set off against no-fault survivor loss benefits payable as a result of non-duty death.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
