Brenners v. Green, 06-20-0044-CV, in the Sixth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas
Jul 27, 2020OUTCOME: Trial court's dismissal of case against client affirmed on appeal
Estate Litigation
PRO
Charles David Glass's Legal Cases (10)
Texarkana, TX
Litigation Lawyer at Texarkana, TX
Practice Areas: Litigation, Divorce & Separation ... +3 more
Amason v. Burrows, 06-19-00051-CV, in the Sixth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas
Jun 19, 2019OUTCOME: Trial court's grant of summary judgment against client reversed and case remanded
Boundary line dispute
Pace v. Pace, CV-18-787, in the Supreme Court for the State of Arkansas
Sep 26, 2018OUTCOME: Trial court's judgment adverse to client affirmed on appeal
Child Custody
SWEPCO v. Lynch, et al., 18-0768, in the Supreme Court for the State of Texas
Aug 17, 2018OUTCOME: Affirmed in part and reverse in part court of appeals judgment in favor of clients
Easement dispute
SWEPCO v. Lynch, et al., 06-17-00067-CV, in the Sixth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas
Jun 02, 2017OUTCOME: Trial court's judgment in favor of clients affirmed on appeal
Easement dispute
In the Interest of W.C.R. and I.S.R., 06-15-00001-CV, in the Sixth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas
Jan 09, 2015OUTCOME: Trial court's judgment in favor of client affirmed on appeal
Child Custody Case
In re: Hughes, 06-14-00076-CV, in the Sixth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas
Sep 12, 2014OUTCOME: Trial court abused discretion in issuing order against client
Mandamus
Paragon Industrial v. Stan Excavating, 06-14-00001-CV, in the Sixth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas
Jan 03, 2014OUTCOME: Trial court did not err in denying client's motion to compel arbitration
Arbitration Agreement
Cummings v. Shelby, 06-16-00087-CV, in the Sixth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas
Aug 01, 2013OUTCOME: Trial court's grant of injunction against client reversed and case remanded
Injunction
In re: State Line Fireworks, Inc., 06-12-00101-CV, in the Sixth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas
Oct 24, 0012OUTCOME: Trial court did not abuse discretion in granting relief in favor of client
Mandamus