"Not Guilty" Federal Tax Evasion
May 21, 2015OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Karl obtained a complete acquittal for his client facing four felony counts of federal tax evasion. After the trial, one of the jurors hugged his client!
Marquette, MI
Criminal defense Lawyer at Marquette, MI
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Divorce & Separation, Litigation
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Karl obtained a complete acquittal for his client facing four felony counts of federal tax evasion. After the trial, one of the jurors hugged his client!
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Karl obtained a complete acquittal for his client facing four felony counts of federal tax evasion. After the trial, one of the jurors hugged his client!
OUTCOME: Acquittal
Karl's client was a former police officer charged with criminal sexual conduct accused of sexually assaulting a developmentally disabled woman. After an intensive jury trial, Karl obtained a full acqu ... ittal.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Karl was appointed to represent a prisoner charged with possession of a weapon. Through extensive cross examination of several corrections officers, Karl obtained a full acquittal for his client.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Karl obtained another "Not Guilty" verdict after a hard-fought jury trial for his client charged with criminal sexual assault. Karl's well-planned cross examination of the accuser was critical to expo ... sing her false allegations against his client.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Karl's client was charged in a two-count federal indictment with possession and transportation of explosive materials. Despite photos of KK handling the materials, snitch testimony with secret recordi ... ngs, and over a dozen federal witnesses, Karl obtained a full acquittal of all charges!
OUTCOME: Jury Verdict For Defendants
Karl represented a national entertainment company who was sued in federal court on allegations of labor law violations. Karl took the case to trial and prevailed in this "winner take all" case.
OUTCOME: Charges Dismissed!
Karl represented a student who was mingling with his friends when a campus police officer pulled up to question them. The officer put Karl's client in the back of the squad car but failed to advise hi ... m of his Miranda rights. During the police questioning, Karl's client admitted to using marijuana and drinking alcohol. He was charged with possession of marijuana and minor in possession of alcohol. At a pretrial hearing, Karl got all charges dismissed. Because of the Miranda violation, the statements made by the client could not be admitted at trial.
OUTCOME: Multiple Felonies Dismissed!
Karl's client was found at the scene of a car accident. The State Police arrested the client and searched his car finding various drugs. At the preliminary exam, the prosecutor failed to produce the ... Crime Lab report. Karl obtained a full dismissal of the felony drug charges.
OUTCOME: All Charges Dismissed!
Karl represented a college student charged with Domestic Violence and Interference With a Telephone Emergency Call. Karl conducted a thorough investigation obtaining phone records, physical evidence, ... witness statements, police reports, dispatcher logs and notes, and physical evidence from the scene of the alleged crime that the police overlooked. The prosecutor dismissed the charges the day before trial.