James Robert Arnett II

James Robert Arnett II

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 39 years

Litigation Lawyer at Dallas, TX
Practice Areas: Litigation, Patent Infringement, Telecommunications ... +2 more

8150 N. Central Expressway, Suite 500, Dallas, TX

About James

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Litigation 50%

40 years

50%
Real Estate 10%

36 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 375-650 per hour

Contingency

25%-40%


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Virgin Islands for 20 years

State: Virgin Islands

Acquired: 2005

Authorized to practice law

No misconduct found

Licensed in Texas for 33 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1992

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Licensed in Hawaii for 39 years

State: Hawaii

Acquired: 1986

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Carter Arnett, PLLC

8150 N. Central Expressway, Suite 500, Dallas, TX, 75206

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

James Robert Arnett II's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

James Robert Arnett II's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse James

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2017

Texas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Best Lawyers in Dallas, D Magazine

2013

Member, College of the State Bar of Texas

2012

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Texas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2011

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

Texas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Fellow, Texas Bar Foundation

2010

Super Lawyer Corporate Counsel Edition, Super Lawyers

2010

Texas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2009

Fellow, Dallas Bar Foundation

2009

Super Lawyer Corporate Counsel Edition, Super Lawyers

2009

Texas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

Super Lawyer Corporate Counsel Edition, Super Lawyers

2008

Texas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Texas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2006

Texas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

1997

AV Peer Review Rating, Martindale-Hubbell

1986

Order of the Coif, UCLA Chapter of the Order of the Coif

Work Experience

2012 - Present

Partner, Carter Scholer, PLLC

2006 - 2012

Partner, Munck Carter LLP

1998 - 2006

Partner, Arnett Gaubert LLP

1995 - 1998

Partner, Neligan Averch LLP

1993 - 1995

Senior Associate, Bickel & Brewer

1988 - 1993

Associate, Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright

1987 - 1988

Judicial Law Clerk, United States Courts

1986 - 1987

Associate, Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright

1979 - 1983

Infantry Officer, United States Marine Corps

Associations

2010 - Present

Tech Titans

Board Member

2009 - Present

Federal Bar Association (Dallas chapter)

Member

2005 - Present

Virgin Islands Bar Association

Member

1995 - Present

Dallas Bar Association

Member

1992 - Present

State Bar of Texas

Member

1986 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1986 - Present

Hawaii State Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Oblio Telecom, Inc. v. Touch Tell, Inc.

Jury returned a net verdict of 10% of the amount sought by Plaintiff

Kemper v. Shelter Mortgage Company, LLC

Jury awarded $10,000 (2% of the amount sought).

Touch Tell, Inc. v. V3 Global, Inc., et al.

Jury awarded $1,450,000

Fiber Systems International, Inc. v. Applied Optical Systems, Inc.

Defense verdict of noninfringement

Aircraft Network LLC v. Cessna Aircraft Company

Jury awarded all fees sought

Hemphill, et al. v. Apple, et al.

Case settled on confidential terms after five days of jury trial.

Vartec Telecom Holding Co. v. Block

Case settled on confidential terms on the 6th day of a jury trial.

Basic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Commercial, Inc.

After a six week trial, the jury returned a verdict of $34.5 million, which was vacated in post-trial motions and the case is currently on appeal

Aircraft Network, LLC v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

After ten day trial, the jury returned a verdict of $2.4 million, which was affirmed in part, modified in part, and reversed in part by the court of appeals.

ART Midwest, Inc. v. Clapper

After ten day trial, the jury returned a verdict finding the partnership dissolved by the opposing party's actions and awarding damages.

Henry Building, Inc. v. II Deerfield Limited Partnership

After eight day trial, the jury awarded all amounts sought by my client, which was affirmed on appeal.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1986

University of California at Los Angeles School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1979

Rice University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2011

Brown Bag Luncheon Series

Are You Prepared If Your Company Gets Sued?

Publications

2008

SmartBusiness Dallas Keep Your List Safe: Protecting Customer Lists as Trade Secrets

2007

SmartBusiness Dallas Keeping Trade Secrets Secret: Protect Yourself from the Inside

1993

Professional Publications, Inc. From Here to Attorney: The Ultimate Guide to Excelling in Law School and Launching Your Legal Career

1985

UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Comment: The American Legal System and Micronesian Customary Law: The Legal Legacy of the United States to the New Nations of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

Languages

English

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution