Stam v. Schofield, Interference 105,325 (BPAI 2006)
N/AOUTCOME: Succeeded in establishing priority in earlier invention and taking patent claims.
Prosecuted patent interference proceeding against earlier patentee to prove client's prior invention.
Grand Rapids, MI
Intellectual property Lawyer at Grand Rapids, MI
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Litigation ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Succeeded in establishing priority in earlier invention and taking patent claims.
Prosecuted patent interference proceeding against earlier patentee to prove client's prior invention.
OUTCOME: Succeeded in establishing priority in earlier invention and taking patent claims.
Prosecuted patent interference proceeding against earlier patentee to prove client's prior invention.
OUTCOME: Successful trial determination of infringement affirmed on appeal.
Enforced patent infringement claim against importer of material handling equipment for sortation conveyors in a full International Trade Commission exclusion proceeding.
OUTCOME: Summary judgment of non-infringement affirmed on appeal.
Successful defense against patent infringement allegations regarding a transit seat.