People v. Nunley
N/AOUTCOME: In favor of Mr. Fifelski's argument
Prosecution sought to convict defendant on Driving While License Suspended charge primarily with documentary evidence. Defense challenged the prosecutor's tactics on constitutional 6th Amendment groun ... ds. The lower court's rulings were in Mr. Fifelski's favor. The prosecution appealed to the Michigan Court of Appeals which ruled in favor Mr. Fifelski and adopted his legal reasoning. The Court of Appeals, as a result of Mr. Fifelski's advocacy, drastically changed the way DWLS charges are prosecuted by ruling that Secretary of State personnel have to testify at trial about providing notice of the suspension before a finding of guilt may enter.
