Handled Over 1001 Michigan Appeals
Nov 16, 2020OUTCOME: Remands, Reversals, Resentencings, Dismissals, and Affirmations
Detroit, MI
Appeals Lawyer at Detroit, MI
Practice Areas: Appeals, Car Accidents ... +4 more
OUTCOME: Remands, Reversals, Resentencings, Dismissals, and Affirmations
OUTCOME: Given 2 years credit time-served, between when free after Michigan failed to pick him up after release from an Ohio prison and his later arrest. This equitable relief was despite no Michigan case law previously supporting this decision.
Michigan failed to pick up Mr. Lasenby following his release from prison out-of-state. Mr. Lasenby spent years as a free man, before he was arrested and incarcerated again.
OUTCOME: Remanded for New Trial
It was improper to use Defendant's admission against him, which had been given while he was handcuffed and without being advised of his Miranda rights.
OUTCOME: Remanded for Resentencing
Federal US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit found that the sentencing judge only addressed part of Overmyer's argument in the lower court, and the lower court failed to address on the merits a go ... od potentially successful argument that Overmyer had made in the lower court. The appellate court remanded in order to give the lower court the opportunity to reexamine this issue and decide it completely on the merits.
OUTCOME: Early immediate release ordered, where prior judge refused to allow Mr. Zaman to accept the plea offer.
Trial court judge refused to allow plea under plea agreement that Defendant's counts would run concurrent. Judge then sentenced Defendant on 5/25/2016 to serve a minimum of 9 years and 3 months in pri ... son. The Judge also ordered Defendant pay nearly $8,000 restitution to police for their investigation. Court of Appeals ordered that a new, unbiased judge shall resentence Defendant to concurrent sentences, within his Guidelines; and that Defendant does not have to pay this restitution. On 4/4/2018, Defendant was resentenced to time served, without having to pay any restitution, and released after having served less than only 3 years.
OUTCOME: Resentenced
Court of Appeals ordered resentencing where Defendant had his sentence improperly increased due to charges that had been dismissed.
OUTCOME: Plea withdrawal granted
Where Defendant (already serving a sentence of up to 25 years) had pled no contest because he was so intoxicated that he did not recall the offense, he was allowed to withdraw his plea after appellate ... counsel showed that the victim was not credible.
OUTCOME: Resentenced
Defendant's sentence was improperly increased by the improper scoring of two offense variables that determined his sentencing guidelines range.
OUTCOME: Conviction set aside, and charges dismissed.
Trial Court post-conviction motion to set aside prior conviction based upon new evidence, where prior appellate counsel previously failed on such a motion.
OUTCOME: Resentenced to time served.
Court of Appeals remanded for resentencing following error in scoring sentencing guidelines.