Seattle, WA
Appeals Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Appeals, Insurance
OUTCOME: Court of Appeals reversed.
Plaintiff claimed he was entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs under the mandatory arbitration statute and rules after accepting an offer of judgment that said it was "inclusive of any and all ... attorney fees and costs”. The trial court agreed.
OUTCOME: Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for trial de novo.
Plaintiff claimed that defense attorney had no authority to request a trial de novo after mandatory arbitration. The trial court agreed.
OUTCOME: Held: First level excess carrier had to pay only $1 million before second level excess coverage was triggered
Dispute between first and second level excess carriers over whether first level carrier had to pay $11 million or $1 million before second level excess coverage was triggered.
OUTCOME: Court of appeals affirmed on all counts.
Plaintiff boater was injured when boat passenger fell against him when jet skier drove too close to their boat. Plaintiff sued grandfather, father, and son, where grandfather owned a jet ski with the s ... ame hull number. Trial court granted summary judgment for grandfather and son. Jury found for father.
OUTCOME: Appellate court affirmed summary judgment of no coverage.
The policyholder's boyfriend was injured while driving a rental car. He claimed he had insurance under the policyholder's policy because he was listed as a driver on the policy.
OUTCOME: 9th Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the hospital and doctors.
Former doctor at hospital sued hospital and doctors for racial discrimination and other civil rights violations that he claimed resulted in his losing hospital privileges.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
