Case No. 3:14-cv-03439-PGS-LHG (D. N.J.) and Case No. 4:10-cv-00102-JEG-RAW (S.D. Iowa)
N/AOUTCOME:
Currently prosecuting claims exceeding $200 million against AT&T and Sprint for their failure to fully pay for services rendered.
Arlington, VA
Litigation Lawyer at Arlington, VA
Practice Areas: Litigation
OUTCOME:
Currently prosecuting claims exceeding $200 million against AT&T and Sprint for their failure to fully pay for services rendered.
OUTCOME:
Obtained dismissal of all claims that the defendant had violated the state and federal antitrust laws by obtaining an exemption for the defendant under the Parker Doctrine.
OUTCOME:
Secured dismissal of a multimillion dollar nationwide class action and established important precedent holding that a telecommunications carrier is not liable for violations by its customers of the Tel ... ephone Consumer Protection Act.
OUTCOME:
Successfully defended a telecommunications carrier during a federal government investigation and on-site audit. The defendant was found innocent and no refunds of any amounts were required.
OUTCOME:
Represented a telecommunications carrier In a suit against the U.S. Government, and successfully obtained a stay of the FCC’s $10 billion auction of personal communications service (“PCS”) spectrum lic ... enses from the U.S. Court of Appeals on the grounds that the government’s auction rules were discriminatory in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. This case is the first and only court stay of an FCC license auction.
OUTCOME:
Challenged a zoning decision under the federal civil rights laws that had prevented the plaintiff from constructing a tower to provide wireless telecommunications services. A settlement was reached pe ... rmitting the tower’s construction.
OUTCOME:
Obtained for the defendant, the dismissal of a collection action in California federal district court, and following that dismissal, also successfully dismissed the identical complaint that was filed w ... ith the FCC. This case established important precedent regarding the respective jurisdictions of the federal courts and federal agencies.
OUTCOME:
Prosecuted a lawsuit on behalf of a local telephone company against a long distance carrier for non-payment of telecommunications services that established important precedent regarding application of ... the Communications Act’s statute of limitations and issue preclusion.