Milan G. Marinkovich's Legal Cases (4)

Insurance

Insurance Defense

Jan 01, 2013

OUTCOME: Dismissal

Obtained a dismissal without prejudice in Harris County, Texas of a subrogation case filed against two of his clients, a trucking company and its driver. Plaintiff alleged the trucking company negligen ... tly entrusted its vehicle to the driver, and that the company’s driver was negligent. Additional research revealed that the plaintiff was the only party who received a traffic citation at the scene of the accident, and prior to the lawsuit being filed, pled guilty to making an unsafe lane change.

Insurance

Insurance Defense

N/A

OUTCOME: Dismissal with Prejudice

Obtained a dismissal with prejudice in Nueces County, Texas of a lawsuit filed against two of his clients, a security company and its director of security. The dismissal with prejudice prohibits the pl ... aintiffs from re-filing their case. Plaintiffs alleged false imprisonment, assault & battery by offensive physical contact and bystander mental anguish.

Insurance

Insurance Defense

N/A

OUTCOME: MSJ Granted; Plaintiff's claims dismissed with Prejudice

Obtained a favorable ruling for his clients in a premises liability case filed in Tarrant County, Texas. This case involved an alleged slip-and-fall by the Plaintiff at the Grapevine Mills Mall. Prior ... to filing the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Milan successfully argued to have 10 of the plaintiff’s expert witnesses excluded from testifying at trial. The Court ultimately granted the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (both No evidence and Traditional) and dismissed all of plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.

Insurance

Insurance Defense

N/A

OUTCOME: Dismissal with Prejudice

Obtained a dismissal with prejudice in Tarrant County, Texas of a lawsuit filed against his client, Service Management Systems, Inc. The dismissal with prejudice precludes plaintiff from re-filing her ... case against this client. Plaintiff alleged the client was in control of all of the elevators at the Ridgmar Mall, and that an allegedly defective elevator caused the plaintiff’s injuries. Early analysis of the plaintiff’s petition revealed the client was not responsible for elevator maintenance. This early action saved the client thousands of dollars in pre-trial discovery and litigation costs.

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

The Avvo Rating explained