Andrew H. Friedman's Legal Cases (5)

Appeals

Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corporation

Jan 18, 2017

OUTCOME: Unanimous Decision In Favor Of Mr. Friedman's Clients By The U.S. Supreme Court

Mr. Friedman served as Counsel of Record in Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp. et. al. (Case No. 10-56068) where he successfully convinced the U. S. Supreme Court to grant the petition for certiorari ... that he filed on behalf of his clients. In January 2017, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Sotomayor, reversed the Ninth Circuit and ruled in favor of Mr. Friedman’s clients.

Employment and labor

Keszey v. Siamak Katal, Detection Logic Fire Protection, Inc.

Oct 22, 2013

OUTCOME: $4.1 Million jury verdict against defendant Siamak Katal

Breach of employment contract and fraud lawsuit

Employment and labor

Anonymous v. Anonymous

Dec 21, 2010

OUTCOME: Jury Verdict - $125,000.00. Court ordered Attorneys' Fees and costs of $250,000.00

2010 Orange County Superior Court sexual harassment/wrongful termination case.

Class action

Lodge, Lertzman, Galaro & Hopkins v. U.S. Remodelers et. a.

Jan 14, 2010

OUTCOME: $1,500,000.00 Settlement

In Lodge, Lertzman, Galaro & Hopkins v. U.S. Remodelers, United State District Court For The Central District of California Case No. CV07-05409 CAS (AJWx), Mr. Friedman negotiated a $1,500,000.00 class ... action settlement in a case involving alleged violations of California's Labor Code including unlawful deductions from pay and a failure to reimbursement business expenses.

Employment and labor

Fontana v. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange

Jun 12, 2009

OUTCOME: Settlement in the amount of $1,575,000.00

A noteworthy example of Andrew H. Friedman's recent legal accomplishments include: Grace Fontana v. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange, Orange County Superior Court, 03CC02559 (2003 – 2009) in which Helmer ... Friedman LLP (and co-counsel Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP) successfully opposed a motion for summary judgment, had a denial of class certification reversed on appeal, prevailed on our motion for class certification and were confirmed as Class Counsel following remand from the Court of Appeal, and settled the case for $1,575,000.00 on allegations that the defendant employer violated the California Fair Employment and Housing Act by using unlawful pre-employment inquiries.

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

The Avvo Rating explained