No Photo

Donald R. McPhail's Legal Cases (9)

Washington, DC

Patent infringement Lawyer at Washington, DC

Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Patent Application

View Profile
View Profile
Patent infringement

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.

N/A

OUTCOME: Barr won on summary judgment, affirmed at Fed Cir

Patent infringement

Impax Laboratories v Aventis SA

N/A

OUTCOME: Patent held valid

Patent infringement

Sprint v theglobe.com et al

N/A

OUTCOME: Settled

Patent infringement

Honeywell v Apple Computer

N/A

OUTCOME: on going

Patent infringement

Plasma Physics v InnoLux Display Corporation

N/A

OUTCOME: on-going

Patent infringement

CardSoft v Verifone

N/A

OUTCOME: on-going

Patent infringement

Sakura Finetek v QuickMBed

N/A

OUTCOME: on-going

Patent infringement

Merck v Sandoz

N/A

OUTCOME: on-going

Patent infringement

Alcon v Sandoz

N/A

OUTCOME: on-going

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
Learn More About the Avvo Rating