We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Mr. Harlan is a trial and appellate attorney with extensive experience in the federal and state courts. He has brought and defended civil actions on behalf of entities and individuals in a broad range of business disputes involving, for example, patent infringement, trademark infringement, control disputes, breaches of contract, fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, RICO, lender's liability, insurance coverage and employment issues. He also has counseled clients and litigated matters involving issues of antitrust law, including representation of a manufacturing company in a 56-day jury trial in which, as lead trial counsel, he secured a $105 million judgment. He also served as First Assistant U.S. Attorney of St. Louis and was responsible for prosecution of major federal criminal cases. Capitalizing on this experience, Mr. Harlan has defended corporations, their officers and employees from criminal charges involving business matters such as price fixing, environmental pollution, government program fraud, mail fraud, false statements and other business-related criminal charges.
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Missouri
Acquired: 1967
No misconduct found
7700 Forsyth Boulevard., Suite. 1800, Saint Louis, MO, 63105
Not Yet Reviewed
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2011
Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America
2010
Missouri & Kansas Super Lawyers, Super Lawyers
2009
Missouri & Kansas Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
N/A
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating, Martindale-Hubbell
2000 - Present
Partner, Senniger Powers LLP
1967
JD - Juris Doctor
1964
BA - Bachelor of Arts
2001
Antitrust 2001: A Morning with the Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and Missouri Attorney General's Office
2000
Is "Relevant Conduct" Relevant? Reconsidering the Guidelines Approach to Real Offense Sentencing
1997
1993
1992